Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #108702

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

SUPERCILEX and others added 16 commits March 1, 2023 18:30
This has been replaced by stage-build.py.
And a couple of other places.
…ere, r=oli-obk

Label opaque type for 'captures lifetime' error message

Providing more information may help make this somewhat opaque (lol) error message a bit clearer.
Add link to component dashboard

It's a pain to find otherwise.
Remove dead pgo.sh file

This has been replaced by stage-build.py.
…osed-generic, r=notriddle

Rustdoc search: Emit an error for unclosed generic

Now, search like `a<` will error as it should (and as written in the eBNF).

r? `@notriddle`
…trieb

Use `Option::as_slice` where applicable

After rust-lang#105871 introduced `Option::as_slice`, this PR uses it within the compiler. I found it interesting that all cases where `as_slice` could be used were done with different code before; so it seems the new API also has the benefit of being "the obvious solution" where before there was a mix of options, none clearly better than the rest.
…on-comments, r=lqd

Improve comments in `needs_process_obligation`.

And a couple of other places.

r? `@lqd`
…y, r=jyn514

Match unmatched backticks in library/

Found with GNU grep:

```
grep -rEn '^(([^`]*`){2})*[^`]*`[^`]*$' library/ | rg -v '\s*[//]?.{1,2}```'
```

split out from rust-lang#108685 as per advice.
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Mar 3, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 3, 2023

📌 Commit e2ae18f has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 3, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 3, 2023

⌛ Testing commit e2ae18f with merge b53cd13ee9d6799f1336b374c6b5abf4925177ce...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 3, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 3, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-14-stage1 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
Testing keyword.js ... OK
Testing macro-check.js ... OK
Testing macro-print.js ... OK
Testing never.js ... OK
/checkout/src/tools/rustdoc-js/tester.js:143
                result_v.forEach((value, index) => {


TypeError: result_v.forEach is not a function
    at valueCheck (/checkout/src/tools/rustdoc-js/tester.js:143:26)
    at runParser (/checkout/src/tools/rustdoc-js/tester.js:170:9)
    at /checkout/src/tools/rustdoc-js/tester.js:306:20
    at runCheck (/checkout/src/tools/rustdoc-js/tester.js:256:30)
    at runChecks (/checkout/src/tools/rustdoc-js/tester.js:305:16)
    at /checkout/src/tools/rustdoc-js/tester.js:426:23
    at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)
    at main (/checkout/src/tools/rustdoc-js/tester.js:421:45)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/checkout/src/tools/rustdoc-js/tester.js:433:14)
    at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:999:30)

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-4cltdg4 branch March 16, 2024 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.