Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve PR job names in Github Actions preview #109868

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Apr 2, 2023

Fixes https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/PR.20CI.20job.20names.

Before: CI / PR (mingw-check, false, ubuntu-20.04-16core-64gb) (pull_request)
After: CI / PR - mingw-check (pull_request)

r? @jyn514

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 2, 2023
@jyn514 jyn514 marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2023 21:52
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Apr 2, 2023

r? infra-ci cc @RalfJung

@rustbot rustbot assigned Mark-Simulacrum and unassigned jyn514 Apr 2, 2023
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Maybe we should apply this to the auto and try sections too? e.g., https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/actions/runs/4589308533/jobs/8104110343 looks like it's named similarly whereas just matrix.name is probably fine.

Before: `CI / PR (mingw-check, false, ubuntu-20.04-16core-64gb) (pull_request)`
After: `CI / PR - mingw-check (pull_request)`
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

r=me

@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Apr 2, 2023

this does start showing "CI / auto - ${{ matrix.name }} (pull_request) Skipped" on PRs instead of "CI / auto (pull_request) Skipped", but given that the job is being skipped anyway, that seems ok.

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 2, 2023

📌 Commit 423e76f has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 2, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2023
Improve PR job names in Github Actions preview

Fixes https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/PR.20CI.20job.20names.

Before: `CI / PR (mingw-check, false, ubuntu-20.04-16core-64gb) (pull_request)`
After:  `CI / PR - mingw-check (pull_request)`

r? `@jyn514`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#109526 (LIBPATH is used as dylib's path environment variable on AIX)
 - rust-lang#109642 (check for missing codegen backeng config)
 - rust-lang#109722 (Implement read_buf for RustHermit)
 - rust-lang#109856 (fix(middle): emit error rather than delay bug when reaching limit)
 - rust-lang#109868 (Improve PR job names in Github Actions preview)
 - rust-lang#109871 (Include invocation start times)
 - rust-lang#109873 (Move some UI tests into subdirectories)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9007ee9 into rust-lang:master Apr 3, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants