Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #110295

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Apr 13, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 8 pull requests #110295

merged 22 commits into from
Apr 13, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

chenyukang and others added 22 commits March 12, 2023 07:50
Stick `#[rustc_nounwind]` to all except `const_eval_select` to undo the
change for all other intrinsics.
with repect to other dead code lints
- remove unused (pun intentional) `continue`
- improve wording with assoc items in general
…jyn514

Fix diff option conflict in UI test

Trivial fix for test case `tests/run-make/rustdoc-verify-output-files`,
it's failing on MacOS, the `-u` option specifies the unified context format, while the `-q` option specifies only brief output. These two options are incompatible, since the unified context format produces a more detailed output than the brief output format.
…r=WaffleLapkin

Check for body owner fallibly in error reporting

Sometimes the "body id" we use for an obligation cause is not actually a body owner, like when we're doing WF checking on items.

Fixes rust-lang#110157
…, r=cjgillot

Added diagnostic for pin! macro in addition to Box::pin if Unpin isn't implemented

I made a PR earlier, but accidentally renamed a branch and that deleted the PR... sorry for the duplicate

Currently, if an operation on `Pin<T>` is performed that requires `T` to implement `Unpin`, the diagnostic suggestion is to use `Box::pin` ("note: consider using `Box::pin`").

This PR suggests pin! as well, as that's another valid way of pinning a value, and avoids a heap allocation. Appropriate diagnostic suggestions were included to highlight the difference in semantics (local pinning for pin! vs non-local for Box::pin).

Fixes rust-lang#109964
Automatically update the LLVM submodule for musl target (and other places)

Fixes rust-lang#109987
…r=lcnr

dead-code-lint: de-dup multiple unused assoc functions

Fixes rust-lang#109600

Prior art: rust-lang#97853
…ment, r=bjorn3

Only emit alignment checks if we have a panic_impl

Fixes rust-lang#109996

r? `@bjorn3` because you commented that this situation could impact you as well
… r=oli-obk

Implement `Copy` for `LocationDetail`

micro-nano-little-change
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Apr 13, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=8

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 13, 2023

📌 Commit 46c6301 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 13, 2023
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Apr 13, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 13, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 46c6301 with merge a41fc00...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 13, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing a41fc00 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 13, 2023
@bors bors merged commit a41fc00 into rust-lang:master Apr 13, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 13, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a41fc00): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.5% [-0.6%, -0.4%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.3% [0.5%, 2.4%] 3
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.3% [2.3%, 2.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.1% [-0.1%, -0.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.9% [-0.1%, 2.4%] 4

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.7% [0.4%, 0.9%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.7% [2.1%, 5.8%] 5
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.7% [0.4%, 0.9%] 2

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-xas29a1 branch March 16, 2024 18:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.