-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document that missing_copy_implementations
and missing_debug_implementations
only apply to public items.
#111572
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…mentations` only apply to public items.
r? @TaKO8Ki (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
May 14, 2023
Yeah, #111359 (comment) says the lint should be restricted to nominally pub items, so this looks fine. r? @compiler-errors @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
May 15, 2023
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2023
Document that `missing_copy_implementations` and `missing_debug_implementations` only apply to public items. I encountered rust-lang#111359 (fixed) and noticed that the documentation didn't say that it was _intended_ that `missing_debug_implementations` only applies to public items. This PR fixes that, and makes the same wording change to `missing_copy_implementations` which has the same condition. I chose the words to also be similar to `missing_docs` which already had such a remark.
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2023
Document that `missing_copy_implementations` and `missing_debug_implementations` only apply to public items. I encountered rust-lang#111359 (fixed) and noticed that the documentation didn't say that it was _intended_ that `missing_debug_implementations` only applies to public items. This PR fixes that, and makes the same wording change to `missing_copy_implementations` which has the same condition. I chose the words to also be similar to `missing_docs` which already had such a remark.
Noratrieb
added a commit
to Noratrieb/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2023
Document that `missing_copy_implementations` and `missing_debug_implementations` only apply to public items. I encountered rust-lang#111359 (fixed) and noticed that the documentation didn't say that it was _intended_ that `missing_debug_implementations` only applies to public items. This PR fixes that, and makes the same wording change to `missing_copy_implementations` which has the same condition. I chose the words to also be similar to `missing_docs` which already had such a remark.
This was referenced May 16, 2023
Noratrieb
added a commit
to Noratrieb/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2023
Document that `missing_copy_implementations` and `missing_debug_implementations` only apply to public items. I encountered rust-lang#111359 (fixed) and noticed that the documentation didn't say that it was _intended_ that `missing_debug_implementations` only applies to public items. This PR fixes that, and makes the same wording change to `missing_copy_implementations` which has the same condition. I chose the words to also be similar to `missing_docs` which already had such a remark.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2023
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#111428 (refactor(resolve): clean up the early error return caused by non-call) - rust-lang#111449 (Recover `impl<T ?Sized>` correctly) - rust-lang#111572 (Document that `missing_copy_implementations` and `missing_debug_implementations` only apply to public items.) - rust-lang#111602 (Suppress "erroneous constant used" for constants tainted by errors) - rust-lang#111605 (fixup version placeholder for `cfi_encoding` feature) - rust-lang#111607 (Add clubby789 to the bootstrap review rotation) - rust-lang#111614 (Add more interesting nonsense to weird-exprs.rs) - rust-lang#111617 (Fixed typo) - rust-lang#111620 (Add eholk back to compiler-contributors reviewers) - rust-lang#111621 (Fix release date of 1.58.1 in release notes.) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I encountered #111359 (fixed) and noticed that the documentation didn't say that it was intended that
missing_debug_implementations
only applies to public items. This PR fixes that, and makes the same wording change tomissing_copy_implementations
which has the same condition.I chose the words to also be similar to
missing_docs
which already had such a remark.