Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: do not hide error logs in a group #114573

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2023

Conversation

Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Aug 7, 2023

This PR avoids creating a GHA group at the very end of a CI workflow when some failure has happened. Before, when a failure has happened, its GHA group was not closed, however the clock drift check function would create a new group, which would actually close the group containing the error log, thus making errors hidden by default, which is not ideal.

See discussion here: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/GHA.20groups.20being.20closed.20on.20failures

r? bootstrap

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 7, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kobzol commented Aug 7, 2023

Looks like with this change, the error is now clearly visible in the CI log 🎉 (I'll leave the commit with the error here for now so that others can look at the CI log).

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Aug 7, 2023

yay

@bors delegate+

r=me with the test commit removed

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 7, 2023

✌️ @Kobzol, you can now approve this pull request!

If @oli-obk told you to "r=me" after making some further change, please make that change, then do @bors r=@oli-obk

@Kobzol Kobzol marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2023 08:21
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kobzol commented Aug 7, 2023

I actually have r= rights, but thanks 😆 (btw, I thought that the syntax is r=login, not r=@login, I wonder it works with @, as bors claims).

@bors r=@oli-obk

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 7, 2023

📌 Commit 8d33608 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 7, 2023
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Aug 7, 2023

I actually have r= rights, but thanks 😆

I was wondering about that XD oops

@albertlarsan68
Copy link
Member

I thought that the syntax is r=login, not r=@login, I wonder it works with @, as bors claims

Both work, the @ version allows to have autocomplete, and (maybe?) reduces chances of typos.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#113568 (Fix spurious test failure with `panic=abort`)
 - rust-lang#114196 (Bubble up nested goals from equation in `predicates_for_object_candidate`)
 - rust-lang#114485 (Add trait decls to SMIR)
 - rust-lang#114495 (Set max_atomic_width for AVR to 16)
 - rust-lang#114496 (Set max_atomic_width for sparc-unknown-linux-gnu to 32)
 - rust-lang#114510 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API changes)
 - rust-lang#114562 (stabilize abi_thiscall)
 - rust-lang#114570 ([miri][typo] Fix a typo in a vector_block comment.)
 - rust-lang#114573 (CI: do not hide error logs in a group)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

scottmcm commented Aug 7, 2023

(btw, I thought that the syntax is r=login, not r=@login, I wonder it works with @, as bors claims).

It actually works with r=fluffy-the-cat too -- AFAIK it doesn't check what you wrote at all.

(I tend to type it with the @ for autocomplete, then remove the @ to reduce the number of pings to the person.)

@bors bors merged commit d9f3d49 into rust-lang:master Aug 7, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Aug 7, 2023
@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the ci-no-group-on-error branch August 7, 2023 18:20
falcucci added a commit to falcucci/changelog-it that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2023
adds the list of contributors to the template. the contributors are: enselic, ralfjung, trolldemorted, matthiaskrgr, ttsugriy, kobzol, and lnicola.

this commit updates `example.md` by adding the contributors to the list. the changes can be seen in the diff:

```diff
diff --git a/templates/example.md b/templates/example.md
index a12803718a3e..da0ecc84c0c6 100644
--- a/templates/example.md
+++ b/templates/example.md
@@ -10,3 +10,16 @@
 - [ci: do not hide error logs in a group](rust-lang/rust#114573)
 - [:arrow_up: `rust-analyzer`](rust-lang/rust#114576)
 - [rollup of 9 pull requests](rust-lang/rust#114585)
+
+### contributors
+
+- [enselic](https://github.com/enselic)
+- [enselic](https://github.com/enselic)
+- [ralfjung](https://github.com/ralfjung)
+- [trolldemorted](https://github.com/trolldemorted)
+- [matthiaskrgr](https://github.com/matthiaskrgr)
+- [matthiaskrgr](https://github.com/matthiaskrgr)
+- [ttsugriy](https://github.com/ttsugriy)
+- [kobzol](https://github.com/kobzol)
+- [lnicola](https://github.com/lnicola)
+- [matthiaskrgr](https://github.com/matthiaskrgr)
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants