Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #117608

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 5, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #117608

merged 8 commits into from
Nov 5, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Zalathar and others added 8 commits October 17, 2023 23:18
When using *Command Line Tools for Xcode* version 15.0, clang will warn about
`argument unused during compilation: '-stdlib=libc++'` if this flag is present
when compiling C files only (i.e. no C++ files).

To avoid this warning, we can add the flag only to CXXFLAGS and not to CFLAGS.
…rsan68

Don't pass `-stdlib=libc++` when building C files on macOS

When using *Command Line Tools for Xcode* version 15.0, clang will warn about `argument unused during compilation: '-stdlib=libc++'` if this flag is present when compiling C files only (i.e. no C++ files).

To avoid this warning, we can add the flag only to CXXFLAGS and not to CFLAGS.

---

[Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/clang.20warning.3A.20argument.20unused.20during.20compilation.20.28libc.2B.2B.29)
…ir, r=Mark-Simulacrum

bootstrap/setup: create hooks directory if non-existing

When running `./x setup` on a local repository I chose to install a `pre-push` git hook, but this happened:

```shell
Would you like to install the git hook?: [y/N] y
error: could not create hook .git/hooks/pre-push: do you already have the git hook installed?
No such file or directory (os error 2)
thread 'main' panicked at src/core/build_steps/setup.rs:462:9:
install_git_hook_maybe(&config) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)
```

This was caused because the `.git/hooks` directory did not exist in my local repository. Creating it manually and re-running the command works fine.

This PR tests for the above directory and if it does not exist then it _tries_ to create it before hard linking the pre-push hook - we use `fs::create_dir()` and disregard the result (ie. it could fail if the directory was created in the meantime) and proceed to call `fs::hard_link()` all the same.
…, r=cjgillot

Remove unused LoadResult::DecodeIncrCache variant
…lstrieb

Add diagnostic items for a few of core's builtin macros

Specifically, `env`, `option_env`, and `include`. There are a number of reasons why people might want to look at these in lints (For example, to ensure that things behave consistently, detect things that might make builds less reproducible, etc).

Concretely, in PL/Rust (well, `plrustc`) we have lints that forbid these (which I'd like to [add to clippy as restriction lints](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/Landing.20a.20flotilla.20of.20lints.3F) eventually), and `dylint` also has [lints that look for `env!`/`option_env!`](https://github.com/trailofbits/dylint/blob/109a07e9f27a9651ef33b6677ccaddd21466e97a/examples/general/env_cargo_path/src/lib.rs) (although perhaps not `include`), which would benefit from this.

My experience is that it's pretty annoying to (robustly) check uses of builtin macros without these IME, although that's perhaps just my own fault (e.g. I could be doing it wrong).

At `@Nilstrieb's` suggestion, I've added a comment that explains why these are here, even though they are not used in the compiler. This is mostly to discourage removal, although it's not a big deal if it happens (I'm certainly not suggesting the presence of these be in any way stable).

---

In theory this is a library PR (in that it's in library/core), but I'm going to roll compiler because the existence of this or not is much more likely something they care about rather than libs. Hopefully nobody objects to this.

r? compiler
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Nov 5, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 5, 2023

📌 Commit a660516 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 5, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 5, 2023

⌛ Testing commit a660516 with merge 04817ff...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 5, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 04817ff to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 5, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 04817ff into rust-lang:master Nov 5, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.75.0 milestone Nov 5, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#116017 Don't pass -stdlib=libc++ when building C files on macOS 47562b96f95767836362373969013370476a5645 (link)
#117524 bootstrap/setup: create hooks directory if non-existing 1b127c9ebd247ae7ad2204ad8c22967f5278f01c (link)
#117588 Remove unused LoadResult::DecodeIncrCache variant 6bc395ba490321a7e2fb45a3ff7cd2ba026fe160 (link)
#117596 Add diagnostic items for a few of core's builtin macros 7c5b137100128bdf8d8dae63b0e61127dd5e2b34 (link)

previous master: 513a48517e

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (04817ff): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.6% [-0.8%, -0.4%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.6% [-0.8%, -0.4%] 3

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.7% [0.6%, 0.8%] 5
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.6% [0.6%, 0.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.7% [0.6%, 0.8%] 5

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 637.364s -> 638.392s (0.16%)
Artifact size: 304.54 MiB -> 304.54 MiB (0.00%)

bors-ferrocene bot added a commit to ferrocene/ferrocene that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2023
84: Automated pull from upstream `master` r=Dajamante a=github-actions[bot]


This PR pulls the following changes from the upstream repository:

* rust-lang/rust#117585
* rust-lang/rust#117576
* rust-lang/rust#96979
* rust-lang/rust#117191
* rust-lang/rust#117179
* rust-lang/rust#117574
* rust-lang/rust#117537
* rust-lang/rust#117608
  * rust-lang/rust#117596
  * rust-lang/rust#117588
  * rust-lang/rust#117524
  * rust-lang/rust#116017
* rust-lang/rust#117504
* rust-lang/rust#117469
* rust-lang/rust#116218
* rust-lang/rust#117589
* rust-lang/rust#117581
* rust-lang/rust#117503
* rust-lang/rust#117590
  * rust-lang/rust#117583
  * rust-lang/rust#117570
  * rust-lang/rust#117562
  * rust-lang/rust#117534
  * rust-lang/rust#116894
  * rust-lang/rust#110340
* rust-lang/rust#113343
* rust-lang/rust#117579
* rust-lang/rust#117094
* rust-lang/rust#117566
* rust-lang/rust#117564
  * rust-lang/rust#117554
  * rust-lang/rust#117550
  * rust-lang/rust#117343
* rust-lang/rust#115274
* rust-lang/rust#117540
* rust-lang/rust#116412
* rust-lang/rust#115333
* rust-lang/rust#117507
* rust-lang/rust#117538
  * rust-lang/rust#117533
  * rust-lang/rust#117523
  * rust-lang/rust#117520
  * rust-lang/rust#117505
  * rust-lang/rust#117434
* rust-lang/rust#117535
* rust-lang/rust#117510
* rust-lang/rust#116439
* rust-lang/rust#117508



Co-authored-by: Ben Wiederhake <BenWiederhake.GitHub@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: SabrinaJewson <sejewson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: J-ZhengLi <lizheng135@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: koka <koka.code@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: bjorn3 <17426603+bjorn3@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joshua Liebow-Feeser <joshlf@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: lengyijun <sjtu5140809011@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zalathar <Zalathar@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Oli Scherer <git-spam-no-reply9815368754983@oli-obk.de>
Co-authored-by: Philipp Krones <hello@philkrones.com>
Co-authored-by: y21 <30553356+y21@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bors <bors@rust-lang.org>
Co-authored-by: bohan <bohan-zhang@foxmail.com>
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-g9fagmv branch March 16, 2024 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants