-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deeply normalize obligations in refining_impl_trait
#121745
Merged
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
compiler-errors:refining-impl-trait-deeply-norm
Feb 29, 2024
Merged
Deeply normalize obligations in refining_impl_trait
#121745
bors
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
compiler-errors:refining-impl-trait-deeply-norm
Feb 29, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Feb 28, 2024
Some changes occurred in engine.rs, potentially modifying the public API of |
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Feb 29, 2024
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
…t-deeply-norm, r=lcnr Deeply normalize obligations in `refining_impl_trait` We somewhat awkwardly use semantic comparison when checking the `refining_impl_trait` lint. This relies on us being able to normalize bounds eagerly to avoid cases where an unnormalized alias is not considered equal to a normalized alias. Since `normalize` in the new solver is a noop, let's use `deeply_normalize` instead. r? lcnr cc `@tmandry,` this should fix your bug lol
This was referenced Feb 29, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119748 (Increase visibility of `join_path` and `split_paths`) - rust-lang#120291 (Have `String` use `SliceIndex` impls from `str`) - rust-lang#121130 (Suggest moving definition if non-found macro_rules! is defined later) - rust-lang#121723 (Two diagnostic things) - rust-lang#121740 (Changing some attributes to only_local.) - rust-lang#121745 (Deeply normalize obligations in `refining_impl_trait`) - rust-lang#121748 (Restore the standard library review rotation to its former glory) - rust-lang#121768 (Implement unwind safety for Condvar on all platforms ) - rust-lang#121777 (Fix typo in `rustc_passes/messages.ftl`) - rust-lang#121778 (Document potential memory leak in unbounded channel) - rust-lang#121779 (Remove unused diagnostic struct) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119748 (Increase visibility of `join_path` and `split_paths`) - rust-lang#120291 (Have `String` use `SliceIndex` impls from `str`) - rust-lang#121723 (Two diagnostic things) - rust-lang#121740 (Changing some attributes to only_local.) - rust-lang#121745 (Deeply normalize obligations in `refining_impl_trait`) - rust-lang#121748 (Restore the standard library review rotation to its former glory) - rust-lang#121768 (Implement unwind safety for Condvar on all platforms ) - rust-lang#121777 (Fix typo in `rustc_passes/messages.ftl`) - rust-lang#121778 (Document potential memory leak in unbounded channel) - rust-lang#121779 (Remove unused diagnostic struct) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#121745 - compiler-errors:refining-impl-trait-deeply-norm, r=lcnr Deeply normalize obligations in `refining_impl_trait` We somewhat awkwardly use semantic comparison when checking the `refining_impl_trait` lint. This relies on us being able to normalize bounds eagerly to avoid cases where an unnormalized alias is not considered equal to a normalized alias. Since `normalize` in the new solver is a noop, let's use `deeply_normalize` instead. r? lcnr cc ``@tmandry,`` this should fix your bug lol
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We somewhat awkwardly use semantic comparison when checking the
refining_impl_trait
lint. This relies on us being able to normalize bounds eagerly to avoid cases where an unnormalized alias is not considered equal to a normalized alias. Sincenormalize
in the new solver is a noop, let's usedeeply_normalize
instead.r? lcnr
cc @tmandry, this should fix your bug lol