Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

linker: Remove laziness and caching from native search directory walks #123854

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2024

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

It shouldn't be necessary for performance now.

Follow up to #123827.

It shouldn't be necessary for performance now.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 12, 2024

r? @TaKO8Ki

rustbot has assigned @TaKO8Ki.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 12, 2024
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 12, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2024
linker: Remove laziness and caching from native search directory walks

It shouldn't be necessary for performance now.

Follow up to rust-lang#123827.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 12, 2024

⌛ Trying commit ed62b57 with merge 06bbc9f...

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Apr 12, 2024

good cleanup, r=me if perf comes back clean

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 12, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 06bbc9f (06bbc9fae04d9d7b5089f56c0aa435a1eb8ef20b)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (06bbc9f): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.5% [-3.5%, -3.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -3.5% [-3.5%, -3.5%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.9% [1.5%, 2.3%] 3
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.8% [2.1%, 3.7%] 14
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.9% [1.5%, 2.3%] 3

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 677.095s -> 676.162s (-0.14%)
Artifact size: 316.00 MiB -> 315.98 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 12, 2024
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=lqd rollup=maybe

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 12, 2024

📌 Commit ed62b57 has been approved by lqd

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 12, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 13, 2024

⌛ Testing commit ed62b57 with merge 3a0db6c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 13, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lqd
Pushing 3a0db6c to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 13, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 3a0db6c into rust-lang:master Apr 13, 2024
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Apr 13, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (3a0db6c): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-5.0% [-5.0%, -5.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -5.0% [-5.0%, -5.0%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 677.551s -> 674.888s (-0.39%)
Artifact size: 316.04 MiB -> 316.04 MiB (-0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants