-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
try to fix the build on emscripten #40821
Conversation
@bors p=10000 This is required for CI to make progress. |
source emsdk_portable/emsdk_env.sh | ||
if [ -d emsdk_portable ]; then | ||
EMSDK_DIR=emsdk_portable | ||
else if [ -d emsdk-portable ]; then |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could be an elif
I think (you wouldn't need the second fi
then).
(Also I think you forgot to r+). |
I wanted someone else to look at this. @bors r=TimNN |
📌 Commit 15297da has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 15297da with merge ded4413... |
Beta-nominating because this is needed for new beta PRs to succeed. |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
Ah, I think the paths in the corresponding Dockerfile need to be adjusted as well. Maybe the better fix here is to just rename the directory, if the name is not what we expect? |
The emsdk-portable .tar.gz now extracts to emsdk-portable instead of emsdk_portable. Handle that.
@bors r=TimNN |
📌 Commit ca85c40 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit ca85c40 with merge 392888e... |
Mac builder is refusing to start |
⌛ Testing commit ca85c40 with merge 106ca3c... |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
@bors r+ |
@bors r=TimNN |
📌 Commit 935d84a has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 935d84a with merge 584d103... |
try to fix the build on emscripten The "upstream" emscripten tar.gz now extracts to `emsdk-portable` instead of `emsdk_portable`, breaking our CI. It might be better to vendor a specific version of emscripten instead of using the latest, but I could not find a good way of doing that. r? @alexcrichton
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
@bors retry p=0 |
@bors p=5 |
try to fix the build on emscripten The "upstream" emscripten tar.gz now extracts to `emsdk-portable` instead of `emsdk_portable`, breaking our CI. It might be better to vendor a specific version of emscripten instead of using the latest, but I could not find a good way of doing that. r? @alexcrichton
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
The "upstream" emscripten tar.gz now extracts to
emsdk-portable
instead ofemsdk_portable
, breaking our CI. It might be better to vendor a specific version of emscripten instead of using the latest, but I could not find a good way of doing that.r? @alexcrichton