Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Try fixing bigendian metadata serialisation #41666

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2017

Conversation

nagisa
Copy link
Member

@nagisa nagisa commented May 1, 2017

I compiled this on PPC to check and it seems to work, but not sure whether I didn't mess up
anything in a major way.

Maybe a good shot at #41443

The easiest way to really test this is to land the patch (a high priority would be good, since I quite literally am just twiddling my thumbs on this now), wait for nightly, and, if the nightly works, backport this to beta.

I compiled this on PPC to check and it seems to work, but not sure whether I didn't mess up
anything in a major way.

Maybe a good shot at rust-lang#41443
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented May 1, 2017

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 1, 2017

📌 Commit 54de274 has been approved by arielb1

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 1, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 54de274 with merge 8f74f95...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2017
Try fixing bigendian metadata serialisation

I compiled this on PPC to check and it seems to work, but not sure whether I didn't mess up
anything in a major way.

Maybe a good shot at #41443

The easiest way to *really* test this is to land the patch (a high priority would be good, since I quite literally am just twiddling my thumbs on this now), wait for nightly, and, if the nightly works, backport this to beta.
@arielb1 arielb1 added A-associated-items Area: Associated items such as associated types and consts. beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. and removed A-associated-items Area: Associated items such as associated types and consts. labels May 1, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 1, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: arielb1
Pushing 8f74f95 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 54de274 into rust-lang:master May 1, 2017
@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

🎉

@nagisa
Copy link
Member Author

nagisa commented May 2, 2017

Confirming the relevant issue as fixed.

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented May 3, 2017

Are you backporting this to beta? I guess we need someone to agree on beta-accepted.

@nagisa nagisa added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 3, 2017
@nagisa
Copy link
Member Author

nagisa commented May 3, 2017

We’ll discuss accepting this for backport on Thursday’s compiler team meeting.

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

I'd be in favor of backporting; small patch. I've not looked deeply at the other side to confirm it's correct, but since nothing has fallen over, and it was tested, I'm assuming it is. =)

cc @rust-lang/compiler

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label May 4, 2017
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

I went ahead and marked as accepted since today is a "focus" mtg. If anyone objects, feel free to leave a comment!

@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

+1 for backporting

@brson brson mentioned this pull request May 10, 2017
@alexcrichton alexcrichton removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label May 10, 2017
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 11, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants