Clarified code example in char primitive doc #55247
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The example was not as clear as it could be because it was making an assumption about the structure of the data in order to multiply the number of collection elements by the item size. This change demonstrates the idea more straightforwardly, without the calculation.
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @joshtriplett (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 0f6e274 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
Nice idea! |
|
⌛ Testing commit 0f6e274 with merge b3e831083fc773de6ae3e20ee97a389e252c5f7e... |
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
peterjoel
changed the title
|
Looks like this failed due to github's current partial outage. |
|
Although the GitHub outage messed up the bors queue (PR status and CI status become out of sync), this particular failure is caused by travis-ci/travis-ci#9696, not GitHub. @bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
pietroalbini
added a commit
to pietroalbini/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2018
…xample, r=joshtriplett Clarified code example in char primitive doc The example was not as clear as it could be because it was making an assumption about the structure of the data in order to multiply the number of elements in the slice by the item size. This change demonstrates the idea more straightforwardly, without needing a calculation, by just comparing the size of the slices.
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2018
…xample, r=joshtriplett Clarified code example in char primitive doc The example was not as clear as it could be because it was making an assumption about the structure of the data in order to multiply the number of elements in the slice by the item size. This change demonstrates the idea more straightforwardly, without needing a calculation, by just comparing the size of the slices.
pietroalbini
added a commit
to pietroalbini/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2018
…xample, r=joshtriplett Clarified code example in char primitive doc The example was not as clear as it could be because it was making an assumption about the structure of the data in order to multiply the number of elements in the slice by the item size. This change demonstrates the idea more straightforwardly, without needing a calculation, by just comparing the size of the slices.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2018
Rollup of 22 pull requests Successful merges: - #53507 (Add doc for impl From for Waker) - #53931 (Gradually expanding libstd's keyword documentation) - #54965 (update tcp stream documentation) - #54977 (Accept `Option<Box<$t:ty>>` in macro argument) - #55138 (in which unused-parens suggestions heed what the user actually wrote) - #55173 (Suggest appropriate syntax on missing lifetime specifier in return type) - #55200 (Documents `From` implementations for `Stdio`) - #55245 (submodules: update clippy from 5afdf8b to b1d0343) - #55247 (Clarified code example in char primitive doc) - #55251 (Fix a typo in the documentation of RangeInclusive) - #55253 (only issue "variant of the expected type" suggestion for enums) - #55254 (Correct trailing ellipsis in name_from_pat) - #55269 (fix typos in various places) - #55282 (Remove redundant clone) - #55285 (Do some copy editing on the release notes) - #55291 (Update stdsimd submodule) - #55296 (Set RUST_BACKTRACE=0 for rustdoc-ui/failed-doctest-output.rs) - #55306 (Regression test for #54478.) - #55328 (Fix doc for new copysign functions) - #55340 (Operands no longer appear in places) - #55345 (Remove is_null) - #55348 (Update RELEASES.md after destabilization of non_modrs_mods) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The example was not as clear as it could be because it was making an assumption about the structure of the data in order to multiply the number of elements in the slice by the item size. This change demonstrates the idea more straightforwardly, without needing a calculation, by just comparing the size of the slices.