-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #60250
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 6 pull requests #60250
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Only suggest label names in the same hygiene context, and use a structured suggestion.
…C_ to make things clearer.
… clean up some run-make tests.
Cast type may be a subtype of the destination type. There is a later assertion that they have the same layout.
Fixes an ICE for the following code: fn foo(_ : &()) {} static X: fn(&'static ()) = foo;
This avoids some unnecessary moves
…p, r=oli-obk MIR generation cleanup * Handle the case where the body of a constant is a subtype of the type of the constant (see `mir_static_subtype.rs`). * Move the evaluation of `ExprKind::Use` into `into.rs`, saving an unnecessary copy.
tweak unresolved label suggestion Only suggest label names in the same hygiene context, and use a structured suggestion. Question for reviewer: Is this the right way to check for label hygiene?
…lexcrichton Add codegen test for PGO instrumentation. This PR adds a codegen test that makes sure that LLVM actually generates instrumentation code when we enable PGO instrumentation in `rustc`. The second commit updates a test case to the new commandline option syntax introduced in rust-lang#59874. Without the fix the test still works, but it confusingly creates a directory called `test.profraw`, which usually is the name of the _file_ where profiling data is collected.
…annotation, r=estebank Fix rust-lang#58270, fix off-by-one error in error diagnostics. This fixes rust-lang#58270 by checking if two diagnostics overlap completely when we're calculating the line offset for each message.
… r=rkruppe Reexport IntErrorKind in std Currently `IntErrorKind` can only be found in `core`. @Centril confirmed on Discord that this is unintentional (should I r? him in this situation?). Should there be a test for this? As far as this *specific* situation goes, I don't think so, I'll risk it and say that there's no way this regresses. However, it might be a good idea to have some tool detect public items in `core` that are not reexported in `std`. Does this belong in tidy, or should that be a separate tool? Is there some rustc-specific *linter*? Unless that's entirely a dumb idea, this should probably get an issue. Note: My local build hasn't finished yet, but it's well past the point where I would expect problems.
Add regression test for rust-lang#53249. Fixes rust-lang#53249. r? @cramertj
@bors r+ p=6 |
📌 Commit 1443f3b has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Apr 25, 2019
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2019
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #59560 (MIR generation cleanup) - #59697 (tweak unresolved label suggestion) - #60038 (Add codegen test for PGO instrumentation.) - #60160 (Fix #58270, fix off-by-one error in error diagnostics.) - #60185 (Reexport IntErrorKind in std) - #60243 (Add regression test for #53249.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
This was referenced Apr 25, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Failed merges:
r? @ghost