Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #70072

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020
Merged

Rollup of 7 pull requests #70072

merged 17 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented Mar 17, 2020

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

JohnTitor and others added 17 commits March 5, 2020 22:59
* Rebuild sanitizers runtimes when LLVM submodule commit changes.
* When rebuilding LLVM / sanitizers, remove the stamp file before
  starting the build process to invalidate previous build output.
typo fix + markdown fix for consistency
…henkov

Make macro metavars respect (non-)hygiene

This makes them more consistent with other name resolution while not breaking any code on crater.
…r=Mark-Simulacrum

bootstrap: Use hash to determine if sanitizers needs to be rebuilt

* Rebuild sanitizers runtimes when LLVM submodule commit changes.
* When rebuilding LLVM / sanitizers, remove the stamp file before
  starting the build process to invalidate previous build output.
implement zeroed and uninitialized with MaybeUninit

This is the second attempt of doing such a change (first PR: rust-lang#62150). The last change [got reverted](rust-lang#63343) because it [caused](rust-lang#62825) some [issues](rust-lang#52898 (comment)) in [code that incorrectly used these functions](AltF02/x11-rs#99).

Since then, the [problematic code has been fixed](AltF02/x11-rs#101), and rustc [gained a lint](rust-lang#63346) that is able to detect many misuses of these functions statically and a [dynamic check that panics](rust-lang#66059) instead of causing UB for some incorrect uses.

Fixes rust-lang#62825
…ikomatsakis

Ensure HAS_FREE_LOCAL_NAMES is set for ReFree

This fixes a bug introduced by rust-lang#69469.
I don't have any ideas on how to reate a regression test for this.
Cosmetic fixes in documentation

typo fix + markdown fix for consistency
Update books

## reference

4 commits in 559e09c..e2f11fe
2020-03-02 01:17:14 +0100 to 2020-03-10 06:59:24 +0100
- Update rustc-guide to rustc-dev-guide (rust-lang/reference#777)
- Fix expression and statement grammar. (rust-lang/reference#776)
- Fix grammar for tuple struct patterns. (rust-lang/reference#775)
- A typo? (rust-lang/reference#770)

## rust-by-example

3 commits in db57f899ea2a56a544c8d280cbf033438666273d..cb369ae95ca36b841960182d26f6d5d9b2e3cc18
2020-02-18 17:46:46 -0300 to 2020-03-14 12:13:22 -0500
- Use rust-lang/rust linkchecker on CI. (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1310)
- Rewrite freeze.md (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1314)
- Clarify type suffixing with example (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1312)

## embedded-book

2 commits in b81ffb7a6f4c5aaed92786e770e99db116aa4ebd..d22a9c487c78095afc4584f1d9b4ec43529d713c
2020-02-27 08:06:04 +0000 to 2020-03-04 09:46:30 +0000
- Updated documentation on profile-overrides  (rust-embedded/book#230)
- Update information on Cargo `profile-overrides`  (rust-embedded/book#229)
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Mar 17, 2020

@bors r+ p=7 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

📌 Commit 36da5ee has been approved by Centril

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 17, 2020
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Mar 17, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 36da5ee with merge e2f02a6cc70217c751b165608c027eab49f4de0b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-azure

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 17, 2020
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Mar 17, 2020

@bors retry spurious

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 17, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 36da5ee with merge 07a2764b2d6f2933be7af36185556d4d2d41e47c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

⌛ Trying commit 36da5ee with merge 0cf4ab5d5551553f3d112a210cb0c8c9ed9901c8...

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

@bors try- retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 17, 2020
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ p=1001

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

📌 Commit 36da5ee has been approved by pietroalbini

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 36da5ee with merge 4aa4d67a3d2341e0c83153e0b9174c24fbd6eefd...

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 17, 2020
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 17, 2020
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

@bors treeclosed- r=Centril p=7 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

📌 Commit 36da5ee has been approved by Centril

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 36da5ee with merge 8ee80f3ed8ff79e8e6de85085b17d7d17c57d4a8...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 36da5ee with merge 660326e...

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Your PR failed (pretty log, raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @rust-lang/infra. (Feature Requests)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: Centril
Pushing 660326e to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 17, 2020
@bors bors merged commit 660326e into rust-lang:master Mar 17, 2020
@Centril Centril deleted the rollup-722hooh branch March 18, 2020 10:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants