Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove Unique::from for shared pointer types #71589

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2020

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 26, 2020
@SimonSapin
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good, thanks!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 26, 2020

📌 Commit 7aebdb6 has been approved by SimonSapin

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 26, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2020
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#68716 (Stabilize `Span::mixed_site`)
 - rust-lang#71263 (Remove unused abs_path method from rustc_span::source_map::FileLoader)
 - rust-lang#71409 (Point at the return type on `.into()` failure caused by `?`)
 - rust-lang#71419 (add message for resolution failure because wrong namespace)
 - rust-lang#71438 (Tweak some suggestions in `rustc_resolve`)
 - rust-lang#71589 (remove Unique::from for shared pointer types)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit cddbed0 into rust-lang:master Apr 27, 2020
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the unique-no-shr branch April 27, 2020 09:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants