Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 11 pull requests #89739

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Oct 10, 2021
Merged

Rollup of 11 pull requests #89739

merged 24 commits into from
Oct 10, 2021

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

joshlf and others added 24 commits August 26, 2021 15:21
* Clarify rounding.
* Avoid "wrapping" wording.
* Omit wrong claim on 0 only being returned in error cases.
* Typo fix for one_less_than_next_power_of_two.
Actually add the feature to the lints ui test
Add tracking issue to the feature declaration
Rename feature gate to non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint
Add more omitted_patterns lint feature gate
Co-authored-by: Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com>
There's nothing insightful to say about these so I didn't write any
extra explanations.
Also tidied up a few other nearby `#[must_use]`s.
…on-fixes, r=scottmcm

Improve docs for int_log

* Clarify rounding.
* Avoid "wrapping" wording.
* Omit wrong claim on 0 only being returned in error cases.
* Typo fix for one_less_than_next_power_of_two.
…Nadrieril,camelid

Feature gate the non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns lint

Fixes rust-lang#89374

Add the machinery to gate the new `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` lint.

relates to rust-lang#89105 and rust-lang#89423
docs: `std::hash::Hash` should ensure prefix-free data

Attempt to synthesize the discussion in rust-lang#89429 into a suggestion regarding `Hash` implementations (not a hard requirement).

Closes rust-lang#89429.
…st, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't rebuild GUI test crates every time you run test src/test/rustdoc-gui

This method has multiple advantages:

 * It'll completely remove the rustdoc-GUI test doc folder if rustdoc was updated
 * It'll rebuild GUI test crates only they have been updated

All in all, it's quite convenient! (even more with rust-lang#88816)

r? ```@Mark-Simulacrum```
Cfg hide no_global_oom_handling and no_fp_fmt_parse

These are unstable sysroot customisation cfg options that only projects building their own sysroot will use (e.g. Rust-for-linux). Most users shouldn't care. `no_global_oom_handling` can be especially annoying since it's applied on many commonly used alloc crate methods (e.g. `Box::new`, `Vec::push`).

r? ```@GuillaumeGomez```
Fix ABNF of inline asm options

This is the case since rust-lang#73227.

r? `@camelid`
…ts, r=joshtriplett

Add #[must_use] to is_condition tests

There's nothing insightful to say about these so I didn't write any extra explanations.

Parent issue: rust-lang#89692
…ods, r=joshtriplett

Add #[must_use] to char escape methods

Parent issue: rust-lang#89692
… r=joshtriplett

Add #[must_use] to math and bit manipulation methods

Also tidied up a few other nearby `#[must_use]`s.

Parent issue: rust-lang#89692
…lable, r=petrochenkov

Stabilize proc_macro::is_available

Tracking issue: rust-lang#71436

The FCP for the stabilization of `proc_macro::is_available` has completed.
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 10, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=11

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 10, 2021

📌 Commit 4d89488 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 10, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 10, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 4d89488 with merge 41dfaaa...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 10, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 41dfaaa to master...

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (41dfaaa): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-kskwqy5 branch November 20, 2021 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.