Inhibit clicks on summary's children #91103
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jsha
added
T-rustdoc
|
Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
A byproduct of using `<details>` and `<summary>` to show/hide detailed documentation was that clicking any part of a method heading (or impl heading) would show or hide the documentation. This was not super noticeable because clicking a link inside the method heading would navigate to that link. But clicking any unlinked black text in a method heading would trigger the behavior. That behavior was somewhat unexpected, and means that if you try to click a type name in a method heading, but miss by a few pixels, you get a confusing surprise. This change inhibits that behavior by putting an event listener on most summaries that cancels the event unless the event target was the summary itself. In practice, that means it cancels the event unless the target was the "[+]" / "[-]", because the rest of the heading is wrapped inside a `<div>`, which is the target for anything that doesn't have a more specific target.
jsha
force-pushed
the
non-toggle-click-doesnt-toggle
branch
from
bd1b456
to
9aef9a2
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Please add a GUI test, otherwise it seems like a good idea. It often happens that when I highlight something, it closes the the doc, which is a bit annoying. |
| goto: file://|DOC_PATH|/test_docs/struct.Foo.html | ||
| size: (1000, 1000) | ||
| assert-attribute: (".impl-items .rustdoc-toggle", {"open": ""}) | ||
| click: (249, 509) // This is the position of "pub" in "pub fn a_method" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can click directly on h4.code-header. I'd much prefer avoiding to use hard coded positions if possible. :)
| assert-attribute: (".impl-items .rustdoc-toggle", {"open": ""}) | ||
| click: (249, 509) // This is the position of "pub" in "pub fn a_method" | ||
| assert-attribute: (".impl-items .rustdoc-toggle", {"open": ""}) | ||
| click: (229, 509) // This is the position of "[-]" next to that pub fn. |
| @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
| // This test ensures that clicking on a method summary, but not on the "[-]", | |||
| // doesn't toggle the <details>. | |||
| debug: true | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Once you're done, please remove this one. ;)
|
I wrote a GUI test, but I couldn't get it to work. I tried to find the coordinates on which to simulate a click by loading the page in a regular browser, but when I tell the tester to click on the coordinates that correspond to the toggle, it doesn't appear to do anything. I tried using |
|
Ah right, for that I use |
jsha
force-pushed
the
non-toggle-click-doesnt-toggle
branch
from
fa0e2c3
to
3f3a7a2
Compare
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2021
|
Looks good to me, one nit remaining but can be ignored. |
jsha
force-pushed
the
non-toggle-click-doesnt-toggle
branch
from
3f3a7a2
to
7f35556
Compare
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2021
|
Thanks! r=me once CI pass |
|
@bors try |
|
⌛ Trying commit 7f35556 with merge 057c2213acefad12356c4f990ecff30c5b32bdf6... |
|
Why the try? |
|
Perhaps I misread the bors docs? Was attempting to trigger a normal re-run of the tests, since I can't reproduce the failure locally. And the CI status reported here doesn't show a failure, just a cancelled check? https://bors.tech/documentation/ |
|
It's easier this way. ;) |
Manishearth
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2021
|
@bors r=Manishearth,GuillaumeGomez |
|
📌 Commit 7f35556 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 23, 2021
…, r=Manishearth,GuillaumeGomez Inhibit clicks on summary's children A byproduct of using `<details>` and `<summary>` to show/hide detailed documentation was that clicking any part of a method heading (or impl heading) would show or hide the documentation. This was not super noticeable because clicking a link inside the method heading would navigate to that link. But clicking any unlinked black text in a method heading would trigger the behavior. That behavior was somewhat unexpected, and means that if you try to click a type name in a method heading, but miss by a few pixels, you get a confusing surprise. This change inhibits that behavior by putting an event listener on most summaries that cancels the event unless the event target was the summary itself. In practice, that means it cancels the event unless the target was the "[+]" / "[-]", because the rest of the heading is wrapped inside a `<div>`, which is the target for anything that doesn't have a more specific target. r? `@Manishearth`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 23, 2021
…askrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#90856 (Suggestion to wrap inner types using 'allocator_api' in tuple) - rust-lang#91103 (Inhibit clicks on summary's children) - rust-lang#91137 (Give people a single link they can click in the contributing guide) - rust-lang#91140 (Split inline const to two feature gates and mark expression position inline const complete) - rust-lang#91148 (Use `derive_default_enum` in the compiler) - rust-lang#91153 (kernel_copy: avoid panic on unexpected OS error) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2021
…eGomez Fix toggle-click-deadspace rustdoc-gui test In rust-lang#91103 I introduced a rustdoc-gui test for clicks on toggles. I introduced some documentation on a method in lib2/struct.Foo.html so there would be something to toggle, but accidentally left the test checking test_docs/struct.Foo.html. That caused the test to reliably fail. I'm not sure how that test got past GitHub Actions and bors, but it's manifesting in test failures at rust-lang#91062 (comment) and rust-lang#91170 (comment). This fixes by pointing at the right file. r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A byproduct of using
<details>and<summary>to show/hide detailed documentation was that clicking any part of a method heading (or impl heading) would show or hide the documentation. This was not super noticeable because clicking a link inside the method heading would navigate to that link. But clicking any unlinked black text in a method heading would trigger the behavior.That behavior was somewhat unexpected, and means that if you try to click a type name in a method heading, but miss by a few pixels, you get a confusing surprise.
This change inhibits that behavior by putting an event listener on most summaries that cancels the event unless the event target was the summary itself. In practice, that means it cancels the event unless the target was the "[+]" / "[-]", because the rest of the heading is wrapped inside a
<div>, which is the target for anything that doesn't have a more specific target.r? @Manishearth