Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generalize "remove &" and "add *" suggestions to more than one deref #91545

Merged

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors commented Dec 5, 2021

Suggest removing more than one & and &mut, along with suggesting adding more than one * (or a combination of the two).

r? @estebank
(since you're experienced with these types of suggestions, feel free to reassign)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 5, 2021
@apiraino apiraino added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Dec 9, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 14, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #92883) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 27, 2022
@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 27, 2022
@JohnCSimon
Copy link
Member

Ping from triage:
@compiler-errors what is the status of this PR? Can you resolve the merge conflicts?

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@JohnCSimon given that this has gone almost 3 months without review, I apologize for not keeping up with rebasing this every time bors tells me that it newly fails to merge.

Should I re-roll for a new highfive reviewer, or @estebank do you plan on taking a look at this sometime in the near future? Thanks!

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

I will rebase this again, just for good measure.

@jackh726
Copy link
Member

r? @jackh726

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned jackh726 and unassigned estebank Feb 28, 2022
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2022

📌 Commit 5ce3f56 has been approved by estebank

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 28, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#91545 (Generalize "remove `&`"  and "add `*`" suggestions to more than one deref)
 - rust-lang#93385 (Rustdoc ty consistency fixes)
 - rust-lang#93926 (Lint against more useless `#[must_use]` attributes)
 - rust-lang#94094 (use BOOL for TCP_NODELAY setsockopt value on Windows)
 - rust-lang#94384 (Add Atomic*::from_mut_slice)
 - rust-lang#94448 (5 - Make more use of `let_chains`)
 - rust-lang#94452 (Sync portable-simd for bitmasks &c.)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4bd40d6 into rust-lang:master Mar 1, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Mar 1, 2022
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the deref-suggestion-improvements branch April 7, 2022 04:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants