Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set the allocation MIN_ALIGN for espidf to 4. #92586

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2022

Conversation

MabezDev
Copy link
Contributor

@MabezDev MabezDev commented Jan 5, 2022

Closes esp-rs#99.

cc: @ivmarkov

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @yaahc

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 5, 2022
@MabezDev MabezDev force-pushed the bugfix/allocation-alignment-espidf branch from 12ef4f2 to 98572a7 Compare January 5, 2022 16:18
@nrc nrc added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jan 6, 2022
@ivmarkov
Copy link
Contributor

ivmarkov commented Jan 6, 2022

Closes esp-rs#99.

cc: @ivmarkov

LGTM.

@MabezDev MabezDev force-pushed the bugfix/allocation-alignment-espidf branch from 98572a7 to 5296bae Compare January 13, 2022 21:09
@MabezDev MabezDev changed the title Set the allocation MIN_ALIGN for espidf to 1. Set the allocation MIN_ALIGN for espidf to 4. Jan 13, 2022
@MabezDev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@igrr clarified in our last community meeting that the min align is actually 4 bytes, not 1. Latest push fixes this.

@MabezDev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ping :).

Is there anything stopping this from being merged?

@yaahc
Copy link
Member

yaahc commented Jan 21, 2022

Ping :).

Is there anything stopping this from being merged?

Nothing other than review bandwidth, sorry for the delay.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 21, 2022

📌 Commit 5296bae has been approved by yaahc

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 21, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#91965 (Add more granular `--exclude` in `x.py`)
 - rust-lang#92467 (Ensure that early-bound function lifetimes are always 'local')
 - rust-lang#92586 (Set the allocation MIN_ALIGN for espidf to 4.)
 - rust-lang#92835 (Improve error message for key="value" cfg arguments.)
 - rust-lang#92843 (Improve string concatenation suggestion)
 - rust-lang#92963 (Implement tuple array diagnostic)
 - rust-lang#93046 (Use let_else in even more places)
 - rust-lang#93109 (Improve `Arc` and `Rc` documentation)
 - rust-lang#93134 (delete `Stdin::split` forwarder)
 - rust-lang#93139 (rustdoc: fix overflow-wrap for table layouts)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 701a833 into rust-lang:master Jan 22, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Jan 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Default allocator doesn't guarantee allocation bigger than 4?
8 participants