-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 5 pull requests #98129
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 5 pull requests #98129
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
!(a & b) = !a | !b
Previously we only show at most 6 lines of suggestions and, if the suggestions are more than 6 lines apart, we've just showed ... at the end. This is probably fine, but quite confusing in my opinion. This commit is an attempt to show ... in places where there is nothing to suggest instead, for example: Before: ```text help: consider enclosing expression in a block | 3 ~ 'l: { match () { () => break 'l, 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ... ``` After: ```text help: consider enclosing expression in a block | 3 ~ 'l: { match () { () => break 'l, 4 | ... 31| 32~ } }; | ```
I'm not sure if I succeeded
Implement stabilization of [I/O safety], aka `#[feature(io_safety)]`. Fixes rust-lang#87074. [I/O safety]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3128-io-safety.md
…o-safety, r=joshtriplett Implement stabilization of `#[feature(io_safety)]`. Implement stabilization of [I/O safety], aka `#[feature(io_safety)]`. Fixes rust-lang#87074. [I/O safety]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3128-io-safety.md
…that_are_quite_far_away_from_each_other, r=estebank Hide irrelevant lines in suggestions to allow for suggestions that are far from each other to be shown This is an attempt to fix suggestions one part of which is 6 lines or more far from the first. I've noticed "the problem" (of not showing some parts of the suggestion) here: rust-lang#97759 (comment). I'm not sure about the implementation (this big closure is just bad and makes already complicated code even more so), but I want to at least discuss the result. Here is an example of how this changes the output: Before: ```text help: consider enclosing expression in a block | 3 ~ 'l: { match () { () => break 'l, 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ... ``` After: ```text help: consider enclosing expression in a block | 3 ~ 'l: { match () { () => break 'l, 4 | ... 31| 32~ } }; | ``` r? `@estebank` `@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics +A-suggestion-diagnostics
BTreeMap: Support custom allocators (v1.5) Related: rust-lang/wg-allocators#7 https://github.com/TimDiekmann/alloc-wg Blocked on: ~~rust-lang#77187~~ ~~rust-lang#78459~~ ~~rust-lang#95036~~ previous: rust-lang#77438
Make `ExprKind::Closure` a struct variant. Simple refactor since we both need it to introduce additional fields in `ExprKind::Closure`. r? `@Aaron1011`
…compiler-errors Remove `rustc_deprecated` diagnostics Follow-up on rust-lang#95960. The diagnostics will remain until the next bootstrap, at which point people will have had six weeks to adjust. `@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics r? `@compiler-errors`
rustbot
added
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Jun 15, 2022
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 2b403ff has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Jun 15, 2022
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jun 15, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
#[feature(io_safety)]
. #95118 (Implement stabilization of#[feature(io_safety)]
.)ExprKind::Closure
a struct variant. #98110 (MakeExprKind::Closure
a struct variant.)rustc_deprecated
diagnostics #98115 (Removerustc_deprecated
diagnostics)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup