Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Point at private fields in struct literal #98283

Merged

Conversation

TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki commented Jun 20, 2022

closes #95872

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki changed the title point at private fields in struct literal Point at private fields in struct literal Jun 20, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 20, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @cjgillot

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 20, 2022
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? @compiler-errors

note: missing field `private` is private
--> $DIR/issue-79593.rs:2:22
|
LL | pub struct Pub { private: () }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, maybe we shouldn't actually point out private fields' definition. It seems like excessive info and showing a private field is kinda against its own purpose...

LL | a: (),
| ----- private field
LL | b: (),
| ----- private field
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe just a note with something like "... and other private fields that were not provided" instead of pointing out the actual fields in the struct definition?

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, address nit and then r=me

src/test/ui/issues/issue-76077.stderr Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors delegate+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 22, 2022

✌️ @TaKO8Ki can now approve this pull request

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki force-pushed the point-at-private-fields-in-struct-literal branch from b37f5d3 to eb86daa Compare June 22, 2022 05:57
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Jun 22, 2022

@bors r=compiler-errors

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 22, 2022

📌 Commit eb86daa has been approved by compiler-errors

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 22, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2022
…struct-literal, r=compiler-errors

Point at private fields in struct literal

closes rust-lang#95872
compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2022
…struct-literal, r=compiler-errors

Point at private fields in struct literal

closes rust-lang#95872
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2022
…piler-errors

Rollup of 16 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#96173 (Fix documentation for  `with_capacity` and `reserve` families of methods)
 - rust-lang#98184 (Give name if anonymous region appears in impl signature)
 - rust-lang#98259 (Greatly improve error reporting for futures and generators in `note_obligation_cause_code`)
 - rust-lang#98269 (Provide a `PathSegment.res` in more cases)
 - rust-lang#98283 (Point at private fields in struct literal)
 - rust-lang#98305 (prohibit_generics: don't alloc error string if no error emitted)
 - rust-lang#98310 (rustdoc: optimize loading of source sidebar)
 - rust-lang#98353 (Migrate two diagnostics from the `rustc_builtin_macros` crate)
 - rust-lang#98355 (Update no_default_libraries handling for emscripten target)
 - rust-lang#98364 (clarify Arc::clone overflow check comment)
 - rust-lang#98365 (Address review comments from rust-lang#98259)
 - rust-lang#98388 (implement `iter_projections` function on `PlaceRef`)
 - rust-lang#98390 (Fixes handling of keywords in rustdoc json output)
 - rust-lang#98409 (triagebot.toml: Allow applying nominated labels)
 - rust-lang#98410 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#98422 (Update browser-ui-test version to 0.9.6)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 41cb5e9 into rust-lang:master Jun 24, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jun 24, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki deleted the point-at-private-fields-in-struct-literal branch June 24, 2022 05:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"cannot construct with struct literal syntax due to inaccessible fields" could use an explain
6 participants