-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Perf triage 2020-08-31 #756
Merged
Mark-Simulacrum
merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:master
from
ecstatic-morse:triage-2019-08-31
Sep 1, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ | ||
# 2020-08-31 Triage Log | ||
|
||
See the [README](README.md) for details on how this log was gathered. | ||
|
||
A quiet week for the most part with the exception of two PRs. The first, | ||
[#76027](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76027), was a rather large | ||
regression that was soon fixed by | ||
[#76030](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76030). The net result seems to | ||
be a small improvement overall on optimized and debug builds. | ||
|
||
Triage done by @ecstaticmorse. | ||
Revision range: [03017003c77d782cf7ed841a05d7c628a9b93f25..d927e5a655809b6b20501889e093c085d6ffe6f7][range] | ||
|
||
[range]: https://perf.rust-lang.org/?start=03017003c77d782cf7ed841a05d7c628a9b93f25&end=d927e5a655809b6b20501889e093c085d6ffe6f7&absolute=false&stat=instructions%3Au | ||
|
||
1 Regression, 2 Improvements, 0 of them in rollups. | ||
|
||
#### Regressions | ||
|
||
[#76027](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76027) ty: remove obsolete pretty printer | ||
- [A major regression on some `incr-patched` benchmarks](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=e98f0632bbec24b196dbd6fc820537f6f3724807&end=8ed5cb56b5e5cc216eb6820a44dd4f7ef65107b0&stat=instructions:u) | ||
- Very small regressions on full builds of other benchmarks along with a major one on `await-call-tree` | ||
- Seems to have been solved by #76030 (see below). | ||
|
||
#### Improvements | ||
|
||
[#75754](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75754) Switch to Snappy compression for metadata | ||
- [A small improvement across the board](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=fe8ab8a530fc2369e2748421a319444383363340&end=7fc048f0712ba515ca11fac204921b9ad8a0c5a3&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
||
[#76030](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76030) cg\_llvm: `fewer_names` in `uncached_llvm_type` | ||
- [A major improvement on some `incr-patched` benchmarks](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=897ef3a0ec001b89fffe7125c20d6a6bb12fee6c&end=1d22f75c9f75cad2e408a145861904898ac982dd&stat=instructions:u) | ||
- Small improvements on full builds of other benchmarks along with a major one on `await-call-tree` | ||
|
||
#### Nags requiring follow up | ||
|
||
None | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be good to follow-up on the regression to make sure we're not missing a bunch of wine (i.e. if it's coincidental that the two PRs have similar effects).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I already left a comment on the regressed PR, but given this comment I'm pretty sure we won't need to nag anybody.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, great, ok.