Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for bootstrap/bootswatch 3.3.7? #149

Closed
miketheman opened this issue Jan 2, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #164
Closed

Support for bootstrap/bootswatch 3.3.7? #149

miketheman opened this issue Jan 2, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #164

Comments

@miketheman
Copy link
Contributor

Is this something desirable? Both were released ~June 2016.

ryan-roemer pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2017
- minor doc fixes
    - I believe I got all 3.3.6 into 3.3.7
    - suggestion to use bs3 over 2
- more specific directions on how to upgrade in future
    - missing documentation of `static/bootstrap-sphinx.css_t` for upgrades
    - much more description of what should go down in `TODO.rst`
        - modified the **epic** `tar` packaging to be more explicit (anybody who has `egrep` aliased can't use the original solution)
- fixed `Makefile` to actually use `python3`
    - added simple option for port override (I'm currently running a mission critical app on `8000` xD)
- fixed `requirements.txt` to allow e.g. `sphinx==1.6.2` or higher
    - `setup.py` has neither of these dependencies?
    - if you add them, you'll need to treat python 2 and 3 separately because of fabric?

#### Notes:

- Candidate to close #149
- Officially the `solar` theme is not in the `v3.3.7` bootswatch tag, see [this issue](thomaspark/bootswatch#643)
    - Just added it manually from the main page
- I don't think you actually want to include the `custom` theme, I'm pretty sure it's either an artifact or a basis for creating your own.
- Changed a few locations referring to the now nonexistent `amelia` theme
 
#### Questions:

1. There is a rather long commented out section in `TODO.rst`.  Might be worth deleting?
2. See changes to `README.rst`, in particular the added `.. warning::`.  The question: I didn't really understand what was going on with #159 because I didn't have any trouble building with `sphinx==1.5.1` or `1.5.5` etc.  Basically, if it's actually a hard requirement then maybe the verbiage is fine, but if not then it's too strong?
3. This is not a "you" problem, but when viewing the source of generated pages I noticed all of the javascript gets loaded at the beginning in the `<meta>` rather than at the bottom.  I know next to nothing about front-end, but those are supposed to be loaded last right (sphinx is doing this, not you)?

Happy to undo / revise any of the included, thanks again for the theme 😄
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant