-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate is_FiniteField etc., make sage.rings.finite_rings a namespace package #32664
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Changed dependencies from #32612 to none |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Commit: |
New commits:
|
Author: Matthias Koeppe |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
comment:16
shouldn't this branch be based on #34804 ? |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
comment:18
Replying to Dima Pasechnik:
There's no relation. #34804 merges cleanly with this branch |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Tests ran successfully in https://github.com/sagemath/sagetrac-mirror/actions/runs/3860089783 (before the migration). Needs review |
Removed branch from issue description; replaced by PR #35119 |
Part of meta-ticket #32414.
Deprecating
is_FiniteField
,is_PrimeFiniteField
, andis_FiniteFieldElement
is done for uniformity but is not needed to support modularization. #32432 shows thatsage.rings.finite_rings.finite_field_base
(which defines the ABCFiniteField
) can be imported without pulling in implementation classes.sage.rings.finite_rings
must become a namespace package because element implementations depend on various libraries.CC: @dimpase @kwankyu @fchapoton @tscrim
Component: refactoring
Author: Matthias Koeppe
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32664
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: