fix: complex IfStmt false negatives #94
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Spencer Schrock <sschrock@google.com>
This represents a more general case of IfStmt, ForStmt and SwitchStmt Signed-off-by: Spencer Schrock <sschrock@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Spencer Schrock <sschrock@google.com>
|
Thank you! LGTM |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes: #93
Looking for
*ast.BinaryExprallowed me to combine handling of theIfStmt,ForStmtand some of theSwitchStmtlogic. The code still needs to look forSwitchStmtto handle forms which have a tag expressionThe new and existing tests pass, but I hope using
ast.BinaryExprisn't too broad that it introduces false positives.