Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Cross build using sbt 0.13.16 #102

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jonas
Copy link
Member

@jonas jonas commented Jun 12, 2017

[warn] 	::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
[warn] 	::          UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES         ::
[warn] 	::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
[warn] 	:: com.lightbend.paradox#sbt-paradox;0.2.12: not found
[warn] 	:: org.planet42#laika-sbt;0.6.0: not found
[warn] 	::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

@jonas jonas force-pushed the cross-build-for-sbt-1.0 branch 3 times, most recently from 475366c to e47ffc5 Compare June 14, 2017 01:49
@larsrh
Copy link
Contributor

larsrh commented Aug 5, 2017

Recursive dependencies:

@xuwei-k xuwei-k force-pushed the cross-build-for-sbt-1.0 branch from e47ffc5 to 75da47a Compare August 8, 2017 00:52
@xuwei-k xuwei-k force-pushed the cross-build-for-sbt-1.0 branch from 75da47a to 27ce9ef Compare August 8, 2017 00:54
@xuwei-k xuwei-k changed the title [WIP] Cross build using sbt 0.13.16-M1 [WIP] Cross build using sbt 0.13.16 Aug 8, 2017
@xuwei-k
Copy link
Member

xuwei-k commented Aug 11, 2017

I just sent another pull request #107.

@xuwei-k xuwei-k mentioned this pull request Aug 11, 2017
@larsrh
Copy link
Contributor

larsrh commented Aug 11, 2017

@xuwei-k I guess this one can be closed, then.

@jonas
Copy link
Member Author

jonas commented Aug 12, 2017

Yes, superseded by #107

@jonas jonas closed this Aug 12, 2017
@jonas jonas deleted the cross-build-for-sbt-1.0 branch August 12, 2017 00:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants