You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In PR #129 we tested the improved routines for wavelength/LSF fitting on our original selection of arc lines across different channels, with no significant improvements.
As an experiment in the NIR channel, we matched (as much as possible) DESI arc lines selection. This (combined with fitting a higher polynomial degree) lead to an improvement of ~0.03 (from 0.07 to 0.04) Angstroms in some cases. We can match DESI's selection in all remaining channels. This should significantly improve b channel wavelength residuals.
Related to this, the following are the remaining bugs in wavelength fittings in different cameras:
Clear outlying fibers in b3:
Systematic offset in some fibers (possibly block boundaries) in z3:
Clear break close to the middle of the chip (fiber ~331) while fitting a 5th order polynomial in z1:
The last one we explored a bit more. We tried replacing lines that show this bimodal behavior in the residuals with no success. This feature is present in all calibration epochs only in z1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If the z3 problem happens only in sky fibers than it is most likely not
associated with a detector artifact. I would suspect a problem with the
initial guess being kind of far away after you jump over the gap from block
to block.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Guillermo A. Blanc
Associate Director of Strategic Initiatives
Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science and Las Campanas
Observatory (LCO)
813 Santa Barbara St, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA
***@***.*** ***@***.***>
------------------------------------------------------------------
*I believe in the importance of personal time. I do not expect a response
to this email outside of your normal working hours.*
*Creo en la importancia del tiempo personal. No espero una respuesta a este
correo fuera de su horario laboral normal.*
In PR #129 we tested the improved routines for wavelength/LSF fitting on our original selection of arc lines across different channels, with no significant improvements.
As an experiment in the NIR channel, we matched (as much as possible) DESI arc lines selection. This (combined with fitting a higher polynomial degree) lead to an improvement of ~0.03 (from 0.07 to 0.04) Angstroms in some cases. We can match DESI's selection in all remaining channels. This should significantly improve b channel wavelength residuals.
Related to this, the following are the remaining bugs in wavelength fittings in different cameras:
Clear outlying fibers in b3:
Systematic offset in some fibers (possibly block boundaries) in z3:
Clear break close to the middle of the chip (fiber ~331) while fitting a 5th order polynomial in z1:
The last one we explored a bit more. We tried replacing lines that show this bimodal behavior in the residuals with no success. This feature is present in all calibration epochs only in z1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: