Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add feature to TXM to detect and purge stuck transactions #12881

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 47 commits
Commits
Show all changes
52 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
246b04d
Added the EVM stuck tx detector component
amit-momin Apr 18, 2024
d47d88f
Added stuck tx handling in Confirmer
amit-momin Apr 19, 2024
8c713dc
Fixed linting
amit-momin Apr 19, 2024
05c5a11
Fixed toml config decoding
amit-momin Apr 19, 2024
360d9fa
Fixed config tests
amit-momin Apr 19, 2024
0a04fff
Fixed web resolver config tests
amit-momin Apr 19, 2024
d26473c
Fixed config docs test
amit-momin Apr 19, 2024
1541c5a
Added zkEVM overflow detection and added unit tests for the detector
amit-momin Apr 23, 2024
1d4113d
Merge branch 'develop' into BCI-2941-Implement-auto-purge-stuck-trans…
amit-momin Apr 23, 2024
c71ac14
Fixed broken tests after merge
amit-momin Apr 23, 2024
2e46dde
Reverted AutoPurgeConfig validation changes and fixed config tests
amit-momin Apr 23, 2024
8185dc8
Added changeset and fixed config validation logic
amit-momin Apr 23, 2024
20bfb9d
Fixed linting
amit-momin Apr 23, 2024
82e3a5d
Fixed linting
amit-momin Apr 23, 2024
db5264e
Fixed purge attempt builder and added tests
amit-momin Apr 24, 2024
0d5b318
Updated evm.txes contraint to allow non-null nonce if fatal_error
amit-momin Apr 24, 2024
25105a1
Added confirmer test
amit-momin Apr 24, 2024
491f9e3
Adjusted confirmer test to better reflect actual process
amit-momin Apr 24, 2024
338ab26
Fixed linting
amit-momin Apr 24, 2024
dc17b98
Merge branch 'develop' into BCI-2941-Implement-auto-purge-stuck-trans…
amit-momin Apr 25, 2024
468b73b
Added purge block num loading on Confirmer startup
amit-momin Apr 25, 2024
736eb89
Updated EVM tx store mock
amit-momin Apr 25, 2024
b2902c6
Fixed linting and testdata
amit-momin Apr 25, 2024
6eb5dc5
Updated stuck tx fatal error messages
amit-momin Apr 25, 2024
a5663ee
Merge branch 'develop' into BCI-2941-Implement-auto-purge-stuck-trans…
amit-momin Apr 25, 2024
0cea37b
Updated sql migration file sequence
amit-momin Apr 25, 2024
a3cd9b7
Skipped loading purge block num if auto-purge feature disabled and fi…
amit-momin Apr 26, 2024
02306fe
Fixed linting
amit-momin Apr 26, 2024
a13605b
Renamed function and moved log
amit-momin Apr 26, 2024
c2deae5
Merge branch 'develop' into BCI-2941-Implement-auto-purge-stuck-trans…
amit-momin Apr 26, 2024
a5ea4aa
Added stricter config validation
amit-momin Apr 26, 2024
1cfb5cc
Fixed linting
amit-momin Apr 27, 2024
335033a
Merge branch 'develop' into BCI-2941-Implement-auto-purge-stuck-trans…
amit-momin Apr 29, 2024
a5ba3a0
Updated auto-purge feature configs to adhere to config naming standards
amit-momin Apr 29, 2024
7513d36
Fixed config doc test and updated changeset
amit-momin Apr 29, 2024
4b41b4b
Updated Scroll and zkEVM config defaults and linted common config
amit-momin Apr 29, 2024
cc5764d
Updated config doc
amit-momin Apr 29, 2024
b1faa07
Merge branch 'develop' into BCI-2941-Implement-auto-purge-stuck-trans…
amit-momin Apr 30, 2024
d67d79b
Generated config doc and fixed linting
amit-momin Apr 30, 2024
c4062f5
Updated config description for AutoPurge.MinAttempts
amit-momin May 9, 2024
54b9c7c
Merge branch 'develop' into BCI-2941-Implement-auto-purge-stuck-trans…
amit-momin May 9, 2024
d244012
Fixed sql migration conflict
amit-momin May 9, 2024
0915400
Fixed linting
amit-momin May 9, 2024
c95d261
Updated stuck tx detector to use PriceMax config and added comments
amit-momin May 13, 2024
db5e5d9
Merge branch 'develop' into BCI-2941-Implement-auto-purge-stuck-trans…
amit-momin May 13, 2024
31d69ba
Fixed linting
amit-momin May 13, 2024
90ec4a3
Merge branch 'develop' into BCI-2941-Implement-auto-purge-stuck-trans…
amit-momin May 22, 2024
d81da52
Updated DetectionApiUrl config example
amit-momin May 22, 2024
a33460b
Merge branch 'develop' into BCI-2941-Implement-auto-purge-stuck-trans…
amit-momin May 23, 2024
c08504b
Fixed issues from latest merge
amit-momin May 23, 2024
88826a7
Renumbered sql migration file
amit-momin May 23, 2024
e400a36
Fixed testdata
amit-momin May 24, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/red-eagles-cry.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
"chainlink": minor
---

#added Added an auto-purge feature to the EVM TXM that identifies terminally stuck transactions either through a chain specific method or heurisitic then purges them to unblock the nonce. Included 4 new toml configs under Transactions.AutoPurge to configure this new feature: Enabled, Threshold, MinAttempts, and DetectionApiUrl.
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion common/config/chaintype.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ const (
ChainWeMix ChainType = "wemix"
ChainXDai ChainType = "xdai" // Deprecated: use ChainGnosis instead
ChainXLayer ChainType = "xlayer"
ChainZkEvm ChainType = "zkevm"
ChainZkSync ChainType = "zksync"
)

Expand All @@ -33,13 +34,14 @@ var ErrInvalidChainType = fmt.Errorf("must be one of %s or omitted", strings.Joi
string(ChainScroll),
string(ChainWeMix),
string(ChainXLayer),
string(ChainZkEvm),
string(ChainZkSync),
}, ", "))

// IsValid returns true if the ChainType value is known or empty.
func (c ChainType) IsValid() bool {
switch c {
case "", ChainArbitrum, ChainCelo, ChainGnosis, ChainKroma, ChainMetis, ChainOptimismBedrock, ChainScroll, ChainWeMix, ChainXDai, ChainXLayer, ChainZkSync:
case "", ChainArbitrum, ChainCelo, ChainGnosis, ChainKroma, ChainMetis, ChainOptimismBedrock, ChainScroll, ChainWeMix, ChainXDai, ChainXLayer, ChainZkEvm, ChainZkSync:
return true
}
return false
Expand Down
106 changes: 97 additions & 9 deletions common/txmgr/confirmer.go
prashantkumar1982 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -122,12 +122,13 @@ type Confirmer[
lggr logger.SugaredLogger
client txmgrtypes.TxmClient[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]
txmgrtypes.TxAttemptBuilder[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE]
resumeCallback ResumeCallback
chainConfig txmgrtypes.ConfirmerChainConfig
feeConfig txmgrtypes.ConfirmerFeeConfig
txConfig txmgrtypes.ConfirmerTransactionsConfig
dbConfig txmgrtypes.ConfirmerDatabaseConfig
chainID CHAIN_ID
stuckTxDetector txmgrtypes.StuckTxDetector[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE]
resumeCallback ResumeCallback
chainConfig txmgrtypes.ConfirmerChainConfig
feeConfig txmgrtypes.ConfirmerFeeConfig
txConfig txmgrtypes.ConfirmerTransactionsConfig
dbConfig txmgrtypes.ConfirmerDatabaseConfig
chainID CHAIN_ID

ks txmgrtypes.KeyStore[ADDR, CHAIN_ID, SEQ]
enabledAddresses []ADDR
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -163,6 +164,7 @@ func NewConfirmer[
txAttemptBuilder txmgrtypes.TxAttemptBuilder[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE],
lggr logger.Logger,
isReceiptNil func(R) bool,
stuckTxDetector txmgrtypes.StuckTxDetector[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE],
) *Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE] {
lggr = logger.Named(lggr, "Confirmer")
return &Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]{
Expand All @@ -179,6 +181,7 @@ func NewConfirmer[
ks: keystore,
mb: mailbox.NewSingle[HEAD](),
isReceiptNil: isReceiptNil,
stuckTxDetector: stuckTxDetector,
}
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -206,6 +209,9 @@ func (ec *Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]) sta
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Confirmer: failed to load EnabledAddressesForChain: %w", err)
}
if err = ec.stuckTxDetector.LoadPurgeBlockNumMap(ctx, ec.enabledAddresses); err != nil {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does it make sense to have LoadPurgeBlockNumMap in the NewStuckTxDetector initialization?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I considered this to avoid another method the confirmer needs to call but this method requires a context. I wouldn't have anything to wire this up to during initialization and didn't want to introduce a context to the TXM builder method just to pass it down to the detector.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You actually need to call this from startInternal(), which can be called multiple times during the lifetime of the Confirmer. So doing it in NewStuckTxDetector() will just be redundant. You still have to call it from here

ec.lggr.Debugf("Confirmer: failed to load the last purged block num for enabled addresses. Process can continue as normal but purge rate limiting may be affected.")
}

ec.ctx, ec.ctxCancel = context.WithCancel(context.Background())
ec.wg = sync.WaitGroup{}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -297,6 +303,13 @@ func (ec *Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]) pro
ec.lggr.Debugw("Finished CheckForReceipts", "headNum", head.BlockNumber(), "time", time.Since(mark), "id", "confirmer")
mark = time.Now()

if err := ec.ProcessStuckTransactions(ctx, head.BlockNumber()); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("ProcessStuckTransactions failed: %w", err)
}

ec.lggr.Debugw("Finished ProcessStuckTransactions", "headNum", head.BlockNumber(), "time", time.Since(mark), "id", "confirmer")
mark = time.Now()

if err := ec.RebroadcastWhereNecessary(ctx, head.BlockNumber()); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("RebroadcastWhereNecessary failed: %w", err)
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -435,6 +448,57 @@ func (ec *Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]) Che
return nil
}

// Determines if any of the unconfirmed transactions are terminally stuck for each enabled address
// If any transaction is found to be terminally stuck, this method sends an empty attempt with bumped gas in an attempt to purge the stuck transaction
func (ec *Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]) ProcessStuckTransactions(ctx context.Context, blockNum int64) error {
prashantkumar1982 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
// Use the detector to find a stuck tx for each enabled address
stuckTxs, err := ec.stuckTxDetector.DetectStuckTransactions(ctx, ec.enabledAddresses, blockNum)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("failed to detect stuck transactions: %w", err)
}
if len(stuckTxs) == 0 {
return nil
}

var wg sync.WaitGroup
wg.Add(len(stuckTxs))
errorList := []error{}
var errMu sync.Mutex
for _, tx := range stuckTxs {
// All stuck transactions will have unique from addresses. It is safe to process separate keys concurrently
// NOTE: This design will block one key if another takes a really long time to execute
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what does key refer to here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just the same disclaimer we have in other places where we process transactions for different fromAddress's in separate go routines. key here refers to a sender key which is just a fromAddress

go func(tx txmgrtypes.Tx[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE]) {
defer wg.Done()
lggr := tx.GetLogger(ec.lggr)
// Create an purge attempt for tx
purgeAttempt, err := ec.TxAttemptBuilder.NewPurgeTxAttempt(ctx, tx, lggr)
prashantkumar1982 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
prashantkumar1982 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@dimriou dimriou May 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What happens if gas bumping fails due to reaching the max limit? I think this logic assumes there is always room for gas bumping. A tx that gets stuck isn't already likely to hit those limits due to gas bumping?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we could consider this as a misconfiguration since our attempt threshold config would have to be higher than the amount of bumped attempts it takes to hit the configured max price. I don't think we can really get around this in code since our hands are tied with configs. I can add a note to the AutoPurge.MinAttempts config to call this out though

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dimriou : I assume you mean the max_price limit on our node?
the max_limit set by the caller should be ignored for Purging, in my opinion.

If we are stuck at max_price, then yes, there's no way to recover, except NOP changing the max_price limit on the node. However if we fix the gas bumping bug in BlockHistoryEstimator, I don't think we will ever hit this situation.
Thoughts?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like ignoring configs could look like unexpected behavior and maybe cause confusion. Since NOPs wouldn't know the inner workings of this auto-purge feature, I could foresee them noticing a tx post with a higher price than their configs and falsely raise a flag only for us to debug and find it was expected.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree about the configs, we shouldn't override them. I guess the NOPs will see the repeated error message and figure out they would have to manually send the txs. I don't see a better alternative.

if err != nil {
errMu.Lock()
errorList = append(errorList, fmt.Errorf("failed to create a purge attempt: %w", err))
errMu.Unlock()
return
}
// Save purge attempt
if err := ec.txStore.SaveInProgressAttempt(ctx, &purgeAttempt); err != nil {
errMu.Lock()
errorList = append(errorList, fmt.Errorf("failed to save purge attempt: %w", err))
errMu.Unlock()
return
}
lggr.Warnw("marked transaction as terminally stuck", "etx", tx)
// Send purge attempt
if err := ec.handleInProgressAttempt(ctx, lggr, tx, purgeAttempt, blockNum); err != nil {
errMu.Lock()
errorList = append(errorList, fmt.Errorf("failed to send purge attempt: %w", err))
errMu.Unlock()
return
}
}(tx)
}
wg.Wait()
return errors.Join(errorList...)
}

func (ec *Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]) separateLikelyConfirmedAttempts(from ADDR, attempts []txmgrtypes.TxAttempt[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE], minedSequence SEQ) []txmgrtypes.TxAttempt[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE] {
if len(attempts) == 0 {
return attempts
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -485,15 +549,21 @@ func (ec *Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]) fet
j = len(attempts)
}

ec.lggr.Debugw(fmt.Sprintf("Batch fetching receipts at indexes %v until (excluded) %v", i, j), "blockNum", blockNum)
ec.lggr.Debugw(fmt.Sprintf("Batch fetching receipts at indexes %d until (excluded) %d", i, j), "blockNum", blockNum)

batch := attempts[i:j]

receipts, err := ec.batchFetchReceipts(ctx, batch, blockNum)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("batchFetchReceipts failed: %w", err)
}
if err := ec.txStore.SaveFetchedReceipts(ctx, receipts, ec.chainID); err != nil {
validReceipts, purgeReceipts := ec.separateValidAndPurgeAttemptReceipts(receipts, batch)
// Saves the receipts and mark the associated transactions as Confirmed
if err := ec.txStore.SaveFetchedReceipts(ctx, validReceipts, TxConfirmed, nil, ec.chainID); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("saveFetchedReceipts failed: %w", err)
}
// Save the receipts but mark the associated transactions as Fatal Error since the original transaction was purged
if err := ec.txStore.SaveFetchedReceipts(ctx, purgeReceipts, TxFatalError, ec.stuckTxDetector.StuckTxFatalError(), ec.chainID); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("saveFetchedReceipts failed: %w", err)
}
promNumConfirmedTxs.WithLabelValues(ec.chainID.String()).Add(float64(len(receipts)))
Expand All @@ -506,6 +576,25 @@ func (ec *Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]) fet
return nil
}

func (ec *Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]) separateValidAndPurgeAttemptReceipts(receipts []R, attempts []txmgrtypes.TxAttempt[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE]) (valid []R, purge []R) {
receiptMap := make(map[TX_HASH]R)
for _, receipt := range receipts {
receiptMap[receipt.GetTxHash()] = receipt
}
for _, attempt := range attempts {
if receipt, ok := receiptMap[attempt.Hash]; ok {
if attempt.IsPurgeAttempt {
// Setting the purged block num here is ok since we have confirmation the tx has been purged with the receipt
ec.stuckTxDetector.SetPurgeBlockNum(attempt.Tx.FromAddress, receipt.GetBlockNumber().Int64())
purge = append(purge, receipt)
} else {
valid = append(valid, receipt)
}
}
}
return
}

func (ec *Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]) getMinedSequenceForAddress(ctx context.Context, from ADDR) (SEQ, error) {
return ec.client.SequenceAt(ctx, from, nil)
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -699,7 +788,6 @@ func (ec *Confirmer[CHAIN_ID, HEAD, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, R, SEQ, FEE]) Fin
lggr.Infow(fmt.Sprintf("Found %d transactions to be re-sent that were previously rejected due to insufficient native token balance", len(etxInsufficientFunds)), "blockNum", blockNum, "address", address)
}

// TODO: Just pass the Q through everything
etxBumps, err := ec.txStore.FindTxsRequiringGasBump(ctx, address, blockNum, gasBumpThreshold, bumpDepth, chainID)
if ctx.Err() != nil {
return nil, nil
Expand Down
28 changes: 28 additions & 0 deletions common/txmgr/types/mocks/tx_attempt_builder.go

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions common/txmgr/types/mocks/tx_store.go

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

26 changes: 26 additions & 0 deletions common/txmgr/types/stuck_tx_detector.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
package types

import (
"context"

feetypes "github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/v2/common/fee/types"
"github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/v2/common/types"
)

// StuckTxDetector is used by the Confirmer to determine if any unconfirmed transactions are terminally stuck
type StuckTxDetector[
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: add comments on what is this interface for.

CHAIN_ID types.ID, // CHAIN_ID - chain id type
ADDR types.Hashable, // ADDR - chain address type
TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH types.Hashable, // various chain hash types
SEQ types.Sequence, // SEQ - chain sequence type (nonce, utxo, etc)
FEE feetypes.Fee, // FEE - chain fee type
] interface {
// Uses either a chain specific API or heuristic to determine if any unconfirmed transactions are terminally stuck. Returns only one transaction per enabled address.
DetectStuckTransactions(ctx context.Context, enabledAddresses []ADDR, blockNum int64) ([]Tx[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE], error)
// Loads the internal map that tracks the last block num a transaction was purged at using the DB state
LoadPurgeBlockNumMap(ctx context.Context, addresses []ADDR) error
prashantkumar1982 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
// Sets the last purged block num after a transaction has been successfully purged with receipt
SetPurgeBlockNum(fromAddress ADDR, blockNum int64)
// Returns the error message to set in the transaction error field to mark it as terminally stuck
StuckTxFatalError() *string
}
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions common/txmgr/types/tx.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ type TxAttempt[
State TxAttemptState
Receipts []ChainReceipt[TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH] `json:"-"`
TxType int
IsPurgeAttempt bool
}

func (a *TxAttempt[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE]) String() string {
Expand Down
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions common/txmgr/types/tx_attempt_builder.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,4 +42,7 @@ type TxAttemptBuilder[

// NewEmptyTxAttempt is used in ForceRebroadcast to create a signed tx with zero value sent to the zero address
NewEmptyTxAttempt(ctx context.Context, seq SEQ, feeLimit uint64, fee FEE, fromAddress ADDR) (attempt TxAttempt[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE], err error)

// NewPurgeTxAttempt is used to create empty transaction attempts with higher gas than the previous attempt to purge stuck transactions
NewPurgeTxAttempt(ctx context.Context, etx Tx[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE], lggr logger.Logger) (attempt TxAttempt[CHAIN_ID, ADDR, TX_HASH, BLOCK_HASH, SEQ, FEE], err error)
}
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion common/txmgr/types/tx_store.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ type TxStore[
FindTxesPendingCallback(ctx context.Context, blockNum int64, chainID CHAIN_ID) (receiptsPlus []ReceiptPlus[R], err error)
// Update tx to mark that its callback has been signaled
UpdateTxCallbackCompleted(ctx context.Context, pipelineTaskRunRid uuid.UUID, chainId CHAIN_ID) error
SaveFetchedReceipts(ctx context.Context, receipts []R, chainID CHAIN_ID) (err error)
SaveFetchedReceipts(ctx context.Context, r []R, state TxState, errorMsg *string, chainID CHAIN_ID) error

// additional methods for tx store management
CheckTxQueueCapacity(ctx context.Context, fromAddress ADDR, maxQueuedTransactions uint64, chainID CHAIN_ID) (err error)
Expand Down
25 changes: 25 additions & 0 deletions core/chains/evm/config/chain_scoped_transactions.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
package config

import (
"net/url"
"time"

"github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/v2/core/chains/evm/config/toml"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -33,3 +34,27 @@ func (t *transactionsConfig) MaxInFlight() uint32 {
func (t *transactionsConfig) MaxQueued() uint64 {
return uint64(*t.c.MaxQueued)
}

func (t *transactionsConfig) AutoPurge() AutoPurgeConfig {
return &autoPurgeConfig{c: t.c.AutoPurge}
}

type autoPurgeConfig struct {
c toml.AutoPurgeConfig
}

func (a *autoPurgeConfig) Enabled() bool {
return *a.c.Enabled
}

func (a *autoPurgeConfig) Threshold() uint32 {
return *a.c.Threshold
}

func (a *autoPurgeConfig) MinAttempts() uint32 {
return *a.c.MinAttempts
}

func (a *autoPurgeConfig) DetectionApiUrl() *url.URL {
return a.c.DetectionApiUrl.URL()
}
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions core/chains/evm/config/config.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ package config

import (
"math/big"
"net/url"
"time"

gethcommon "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -100,6 +101,14 @@ type Transactions interface {
ReaperThreshold() time.Duration
MaxInFlight() uint32
MaxQueued() uint64
AutoPurge() AutoPurgeConfig
}

type AutoPurgeConfig interface {
Enabled() bool
Threshold() uint32
MinAttempts() uint32
DetectionApiUrl() *url.URL
}

//go:generate mockery --quiet --name GasEstimator --output ./mocks/ --case=underscore
Expand Down
Loading
Loading