Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[easy] utility function to test equality of two sets of tick markers. #1691

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2019

Conversation

ttung
Copy link
Collaborator

@ttung ttung commented Dec 10, 2019

This works for both pixel and physical ticks.

This works for both pixel and physical ticks.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 10, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1691 into master will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 25%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1691      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.85%   89.79%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         239      239              
  Lines        8966     8974       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         8056     8058       +2     
- Misses        910      916       +6
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
starfish/core/morphology/util.py 69.56% <25%> (-23.77%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a48171c...5b14dbb. Read the comment docs.

@ttung ttung merged commit 3584c57 into master Dec 11, 2019
@ttung ttung deleted the tonytung-ticks-eq branch December 11, 2019 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants