Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFC]: feat: add C implementation for @stdlib/math/base/assert/int32-is-odd #1806

Closed
3 tasks done
Shashankss1205 opened this issue Mar 9, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1865
Closed
3 tasks done

[RFC]: feat: add C implementation for @stdlib/math/base/assert/int32-is-odd #1806

Shashankss1205 opened this issue Mar 9, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1865

Comments

@Shashankss1205
Copy link
Contributor

Shashankss1205 commented Mar 9, 2024

Description

This RFC proposes adding native C implementation for @stdlib/math/base/assert/int32-is-odd.

double stdlib_base_int32_is_odd( int32_t x );

Related Issues

Related issues #1433 , #1449 , #.

Questions

No.

Other

No.

Checklist

  • I have read and understood the Code of Conduct.
  • Searched for existing issues and pull requests.
  • The issue name begins with RFC:.
@Shashankss1205
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please Assign it to me @kgryte , @Planeshifter as it is related to my previous issues and PR's for is-odd and int32-is-even

@Rejoan-Sardar
Copy link
Contributor

@kgryte @Planeshifter I would like to work on it.

Planeshifter added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2024
PR-URL: #1865
Closes: #1806 

---------

Signed-off-by: Pranav <85227306+Pranavchiku@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Burckhardt <pburckhardt@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <85227306+Pranavchiku@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Philipp Burckhardt <pburckhardt@outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Pranav <85227306+Pranavchiku@users.noreply.github.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Burckhardt <pburckhardt@outlook.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants