[Cookbook][Bundles] improve explanation of code block for bundle removal #3413
Conversation
cordoval
restored the
3384-improve-explanation-of-code-block-for-bundle-removal
branch
| @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ rely on the bundle you are about to remove. | |||
| .. tip:: | |||
|
|
|||
| If one bundle relies on another, in most it means that it uses some services | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ah, we have a typo here as well (in most cases it means). Could you possibly add that to your PR (even though it wasn't your mistake)?
Thanks :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sorry i did not see this, I am in Salt Lake City, Utah now so this escaped me else I would have fixed it, sorry @weaverryan
|
Thanks Luis! |
… bundle removal (cordoval) This PR was merged into the 2.3 branch. Discussion ---------- [Cookbook][Bundles] improve explanation of code block for bundle removal | Q | A | | --- | --- | | Doc fix? | yes | | New docs? | no | | Applies to | 2.3+ | | Fixed tickets | #3384 | | License | CC-ASA 3.0 Unported | Sent using [manager-tools](https://github.com/cordoval/manager-tools) Commits ------- a4d804d improve explanation of code block for bundle removal and fix typo
|
we gotta get you close PRs with Gush @weaverryan 👶 just |
cordoval
deleted the
3384-improve-explanation-of-code-block-for-bundle-removal
branch
|
@cordoval sorry, we choosed to use gh for the docs :) And please, please stop with advertising of your tool. It becomes annoying... |
|
in that case cool, I did not know it first hand from @weaverryan, thanks for the info @wouterj |
Sent using Gush