Fix importing in Python 3.7 #75
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update to the package involves a minor version bump to Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Actionable comments outside the diff hunks (3)
sleap_io/io/jabs.py (3)
Line range hint
11-34: Ensure that the global variables defining default keypoints, edges, and symmetries are not modified at runtime to prevent unexpected behavior.
Line range hint
76-180: Consider refactoring theread_labelsfunction to improve readability and maintainability. Splitting the function into smaller, more focused functions could make the code easier to understand and modify in the future.
Line range hint
182-273: Ensure consistent error handling and input validation, especially in functions performing file I/O operations or interacting with external resources. This practice helps prevent runtime errors and ensures the robustness of the code.
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- sleap_io/init.py (1 hunks)
- sleap_io/io/jabs.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- sleap_io/init.py
Additional comments not posted (1)
sleap_io/io/jabs.py (1)
3-3: LGTM! The addition offrom __future__ import annotationsis correctly placed and necessary for Python 3.7 compatibility with newer type hinting syntax.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)
Line range hint
1-1: Verify the impact of removing"setup.cfg"from the CI trigger paths to ensure it doesn't skip necessary checks for configuration changes that could affect the build or tests.Verification successful
The script execution did not find any direct references to
setup.cfgwithin the.github/workflows/ci.ymlfile. This suggests that the removal ofsetup.cfgfrom the CI trigger paths does not directly affect the CI workflow as defined in this specific file. However, it's important to consider thatsetup.cfgcould still indirectly influence the build or tests through its configuration of tools or scripts that the CI workflow might invoke. Given the scope of the verification was to check for direct references within theci.ymlfile, this aspect of the review comment is verified with the understanding of the mentioned limitations.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for references to setup.cfg in the workflow to ensure its removal doesn't affect CI checks. rg 'setup.cfg' .github/workflows/ci.ymlLength of output: 39
101-101: The addition of package installations to address the OpenCV issue is necessary. However, monitor for any potential long-term impacts or dependencies introduced by this workaround.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #75 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.45% 94.45%
=======================================
Files 13 13
Lines 1442 1443 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 1362 1363 +1
Misses 80 80 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Added a
from __future__ import annotationsin a module using newer type hinting syntax.Summary by CodeRabbit