-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Editorial: avoid using Type macro for simple type tests #2874
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't review for completeness, but what's here LGTM.
I think it would be worth putting something in the "Object Type" section which specifically calls out that some members of the type are callable. The current "is logically a collection of properties" definition really obscures that. Not as part of this PR, though.
Updated to match <tc39/ecma262#2874>.
Updated to match <tc39/ecma262#2874>.
Updated to match <tc39/ecma262#2874>.
Updated to match <tc39/ecma262#2874>.
Updated to match <tc39/ecma262#2874>.
This is a partial resolution for #2870, as suggested by @jmdyck.