Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Pundit >2.2.0 include #2141

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2022
Merged

Fix Pundit >2.2.0 include #2141

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2022

Conversation

nickcharlton
Copy link
Member

@nickcharlton nickcharlton commented Feb 14, 2022

In #2140, we updated Pundit but it also needs the include changing.

varvet/pundit@4d9b584


@sedubois, a fix for your comment. Is this what you meant?

@sedubois
Copy link
Contributor

Yes 👍 The tests are just failing because Rails needs an upgrade.

@nickcharlton nickcharlton force-pushed the nc-update-pundit-include branch from 60525ab to a14f7cd Compare February 15, 2022 11:09
In #2140, we updated Pundit but it also needs the include changing.

varvet/pundit@4d9b584
@nickcharlton nickcharlton force-pushed the nc-update-pundit-include branch from a14f7cd to e7fc1b9 Compare February 15, 2022 12:01
@nickcharlton nickcharlton merged commit 6939dbe into main Feb 15, 2022
@nickcharlton nickcharlton deleted the nc-update-pundit-include branch February 15, 2022 12:29
fbuys added a commit to fbuys/administrate that referenced this pull request May 23, 2023
This commit fixes: thoughtbot#2378
By adding a conditional that includes Pundit::Authorization when it is
defined else it includes Pundit.

This change ensures that we remain compatible with Pundit < 2.2.0

See: thoughtbot#2141
See: thoughtbot#1068
fbuys added a commit to fbuys/administrate that referenced this pull request May 23, 2023
This commit fixes: thoughtbot#2378
By adding a conditional that includes Pundit::Authorization when it is
defined else it includes Pundit.

This change ensures that we remain compatible with Pundit < 2.2.0

To test with Pundit "~> 2.1.0", we run:
```
bundle exec appraisal pundit21 rspec spec/controllers/concerns/administrate/punditize_spec.rb
```

See: thoughtbot#2141
See: thoughtbot#1068
fbuys added a commit to fbuys/administrate that referenced this pull request May 23, 2023
This commit fixes: thoughtbot#2378
By adding a conditional that includes Pundit::Authorization when it is
defined else it includes Pundit.

This change ensures that we remain compatible with Pundit < 2.2.0

To test with Pundit "~> 2.1.0", we run:
```
bundle exec appraisal pundit21 rspec spec/controllers/concerns/administrate/punditize_spec.rb
```

See: thoughtbot#2141
See: thoughtbot#1068
fbuys added a commit to fbuys/administrate that referenced this pull request May 24, 2023
This commit fixes: thoughtbot#2378
By adding a conditional that includes Pundit::Authorization when it is
defined else it includes Pundit.

This change ensures that we remain compatible with Pundit < 2.2.0

To test with Pundit "~> 2.1.0", we run:
```
bundle exec appraisal pundit21 rspec spec/controllers/concerns/administrate/punditize_spec.rb
```

See: thoughtbot#2141
See: thoughtbot#1068
fbuys added a commit to fbuys/administrate that referenced this pull request May 26, 2023
This commit fixes: thoughtbot#2378
By adding a conditional that includes Pundit::Authorization when it is
defined else it includes Pundit.

This change ensures that we remain compatible with Pundit < 2.2.0

To test with Pundit "~> 2.1.0", we run:
```
bundle exec appraisal pundit21 rspec spec/controllers/concerns/administrate/punditize_spec.rb
```

See: thoughtbot#2141
See: thoughtbot#1068
pablobm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2023
This commit fixes #2378
by adding a conditional that includes Pundit::Authorization when it is
defined else it includes Pundit.

This change ensures that we remain compatible with Pundit < 2.2.0

To test with Pundit "~> 2.1.0", we run:

```
bundle exec appraisal pundit21 rspec spec/controllers/concerns/administrate/punditize_spec.rb
```

See: #2141
See: #1068
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants