ufw: use manned as more information link

[navarroaxel]

• The page (if new), does not already exist in the repo.
• The page is in the correct platform directory (common/, linux/, etc.)
• The page has 8 or fewer examples.
• The PR title conforms to the recommended templates.
• The page follows the content guidelines.
• The page description includes a link to documentation or a homepage (if applicable).

Related discussion: #6170 (comment)

[CleanMachine1]

Why?

the ubuntu page is way better than a man page. It provides examples, modification and what it does feature-wise.

Manned is for last resorts when there is nothing else, correct?

[CleanMachine1]

#6170 (comment)

Nevermind, I see its use. I hadn't looked at the other PR.

I can't tell which is better however I am willing to have either

[navarroaxel]

@CleanMachine1 I believe that a link to a wiki page is better than the same man page that the user has in the CLI, but this was the decision that we made in #5510 🤷‍♂️

[sbrl]

Yeah, generally we only go for a man page if there's nothing else that's appropriate, though it's really a case-by-case thing.

[sbrl]

Believe it or not, UFW is actually Ubuntu-specific as best I can tell - at least it started that way. To that end, the Ubuntu wiki page is more informative here.

[CleanMachine1]

UFW was made for ubuntu to my knowledge however seems to adopted from uncomplicated nature.

[marchersimon]

@CleanMachine1 I believe that a link to a wiki page is better than the same man page that the user has in the CLI, but this was the decision that we made in #5510 man_shrugging

@navarroaxel as far as I can remember we only made a decision for which man page side we should use as default. We always preferred Wikis or Homepages over man pages.

[github-actions]

Hi all! This thread has not had any recent activity.
Are there any updates? Thanks!