Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adopt sbt-typelevel #208

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jan 16, 2022
Merged

Adopt sbt-typelevel #208

merged 17 commits into from
Jan 16, 2022

Conversation

rossabaker
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rossabaker
Copy link
Member Author

Still depends on a snapshot. Not ready for primetime, even if green.

build.sbt Outdated
"3.0.0-RC1" -> "1.0.0",
"3.0.0-RC2" -> "1.0.1",
"3.0.0-RC3" -> "1.1.3"
),
homepage := Some(url("https://github.com/typelevel/case-insensitive")),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is set automatically too btw.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, but it should probably be https://typelevel.org/case-insensitive/.

build.sbt Outdated
Comment on lines 135 to 136
githubWorkflowTargetTags ++= Seq("v*"),
githubWorkflowPublishTargetBranches := Seq(RefPredicate.StartsWith(Ref.Tag("v"))),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As are these.

@rossabaker
Copy link
Member Author

We lost the Sonatype variable declarations. Do we not need those?

build.sbt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rossabaker rossabaker marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2022 21:48
@rossabaker
Copy link
Member Author

Well, looks like it worked!

@armanbilge armanbilge deleted the sbt-typelevel branch May 13, 2022 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants