Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrade to scalacheck 1.14 #2748

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

upgrade to scalacheck 1.14 #2748

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fkowal
Copy link

@fkowal fkowal commented Mar 9, 2019

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 9, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #2748 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2748   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.33%   95.33%           
=======================================
  Files         363      363           
  Lines        6777     6777           
  Branches      299      297    -2     
=======================================
  Hits         6461     6461           
  Misses        316      316
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
testkit/src/main/scala/cats/tests/CatsSuite.scala 33.33% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eab04cf...f659c5b. Read the comment docs.

@LukaJCB
Copy link
Member

LukaJCB commented Mar 9, 2019

Hi @fkowal thanks for opening this PR, unfortunately it's a duplicate of this one: #2734

@fkowal
Copy link
Author

fkowal commented Mar 9, 2019

ok, guess i'll wait for scalatest 3.1.0 release

@fkowal fkowal closed this Mar 9, 2019
@fkowal fkowal deleted the scalacheck-1.14 branch March 9, 2019 18:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants