-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 486
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug fixes for compactCells #558
Merged
isaacbrodsky
merged 38 commits into
uber:master
from
isaacbrodsky:llvm-fuzzer-compact-2
Jan 23, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
38 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0277ce5
Add LLVM fuzzer harness
1c8ec2e
Add AFL++ test case generator
b89c76b
Fuzz more gridDisk functions
79d2e2c
add fuzzerH3SetToLinkedGeo
a28a807
Add more fuzzers
9445cbb
Additional fuzzers
f971dcf
add fuzzerVertexes
e0c8841
Add test-fuzzer script
007b7c3
Fix linux build
02abb99
Fix fuzzerIndexIO
caedc90
test-fuzzer use subshell for ls
isaacbrodsky de5a2c3
Update test-fuzzer again
isaacbrodsky 8bbc36a
Fix test-fuzzer again
isaacbrodsky 021c994
fuzzerCompact
2195863
Update readme
4a65123
libFuzzer tests
1e7066e
reformat header
0ede718
README updates
65b4ef3
fuzzerDirectedEdge
79b1f44
fuzzerLocalIj
25360ef
fix fuzzerDirectedEdge build
ac4b918
Fix fuzzer programs
isaacbrodsky 1145bce
remove logging
isaacbrodsky cd14266
remove h3Println
isaacbrodsky 76532d8
add fuzzerPoylgonToCells
isaacbrodsky 84bc4e9
Update per review
323d9e9
Merge branch 'master' into llvm-fuzzer-harness
e04c62c
Add comment on memcpy per review
0016f1c
Fix potential crash in vertexRotations
7807131
Merge branch 'master' into llvm-fuzzer-harness
4b4e623
Catch possible failure in getIcosahedronFaces
d501e51
Don't assert specific error in testVertex
caf34a9
Compact fuzzer updates and bugfixes
7244efe
Merge branch 'master' into llvm-fuzzer-compact-2
82f5531
Fix assertion message in testCompactCells.c
isaacbrodsky 05980d0
Change assert messages
isaacbrodsky 560f06f
Merge branch 'master' into llvm-fuzzer-compact-2
isaacbrodsky 2392c4e
Fix formatting
isaacbrodsky File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not required, but I wonder if it would make sense to do this kind of validity check first, and fail faster? We could do this without allocating any memory we need to free, and it wouldn't change the complexity
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd leave that to a separate PR with benchmarks to say