Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ocean stochastic physics #371

Closed
pjpegion opened this issue Jan 14, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #372
Closed

ocean stochastic physics #371

pjpegion opened this issue Jan 14, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #372
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pjpegion
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Coupled ensemble data assimilation will need stochastic schemes to address model uncertainty in all components of the coupled system. I first cut of ocean stochastic physics (SPPT and TKE perturbations in the Energetic PBL) have been developed and can get merged into the UFS.

Solution

Additions of calls to ocean stochastic physics from MOM6 and modifications to code in parameterizations/vertical are necessary.
In addition, the capability of writing out stochastic physics restarts in netCDF at the restart interval is supported

Related to

This issue will require PRs of
ccpp-physics, fv3atm, MOM6, and stochastic_physics

  • required to support noaa-emc/nems/issues/<issue_number>
  • needed by noaa-emc/fv3atm/pull/<pr_number>
@pjpegion
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The ocean stochastic physics will be merged in later. Other PRs are ready.

@arunchawla-NOAA
Copy link

@junwang-noaa and @pjpegion where are we with the status of this ?

@junwang-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator

junwang-noaa commented Mar 11, 2021 via email

@jiandewang
Copy link
Collaborator

on GFDL side Bob has already taken a look at Phil's code, and has some concerns on the way the code is inserted in the MOM6 code. Bob is going to give guidance to Phil on the top level design on where and how to implement the stochastic code in MOM6. Phil told me that he will have a tag-up with Bob this month.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants