-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stoch updates #372
Stoch updates #372
Conversation
update my fork
Updates to stochastic_physics_wrapper (ufs-community#280)
update to ufs-community develop
I do not see cheyenne log files. |
I just pushed them. |
@BrianCurtis-NOAA can you provide more infomation on what you are doing? I ran the hera.gnu test this morning, and I see that just up ran to too, and now I see that your hera.intel test failed, but mine worked. |
Duplication of efforts it seems ... hera just had intel compiler (license?) issues. |
It's auto-rt jobs that I submitted. It's not Brian. |
@DusanJovic-NOAA thanks for the clarification |
Machine: jet |
Those three failed tests on jets have the same system error: sbatch: error: Batch job submission failed: Socket timed out on send/recv operation I compared the output of fv3_HAFS_v0_hwrf_thompson_debug and it has zero difference from baseline at FHR24. |
I reran the test manually. Log file is here: |
* upstream/develop: Stoch updates (ufs-community#372) Final step to remove IPD (remove _ccpp labels from regression tests), RAS updates and regression tests (ufs-community#448)
Description
This PR references issue #371
Addition of stochastic physics restarts in netCDF format that will be written at the restart interval, and at end of run.
Addition of stochastic cloud perturbation and Micropyiscs perturbations for SPPT.
and
clean up of stochastic physics code.
Is a change of answers expected from this PR?
No changes are expected with regression tests except the stochastic physics related regression tests. Stochastic physics regression test answer does change due to using a local version of ffpack instead of the fftpack in splib.
Issue(s) addressed
Testing
testing of new science additions were tested with 1-degree coupled model ensemble forecasts out to 35-day
What compilers / HPCs was it tested with? All tests on hera with intel and GNU compuler.
Are the changes covered by regression tests? (If not, why? Do new tests need to be added?)
The cloud perturbations and microphhysics perturbations are not included in any RTs.
Have the ufs-weather-model regression test been run? Currently a subset of regression tests were run on hera with intel and GNU compliers
Will the code updates change regression test baseline? If yes, why?
Yes, stochastic physics test will be changed due to using a local version of fftpack
I am waiting on code review before doing the full regression test suite.
new baseline date tag is 20210318.
Dependencies
If testing this branch requires non-default branches in other repositories, list them.
Those branches should have matching names (ideally)