Start on suggestions; allow disabling of known issues

[RobH123]

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #59 (b600d85) into master (bbba5f5) will increase coverage by 0.25%.
The diff coverage is 52.60%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #59      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   46.14%   46.39%   +0.25%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        2241     2444     +203     
  Branches      716      789      +73     
==========================================
+ Hits         1034     1134     +100     
- Misses        742      818      +76     
- Partials      465      492      +27     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/core/field-link-check.js	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/core/getApi.js	11.83% <ø> (+1.18%)	⬆️
src/core/ta-reference-check.js	89.58% <ø> (-0.22%)	⬇️
src/core/utilities.js	14.28% <ø> (ø)
src/core/annotation-row-check.js	1.76% <2.00%> (-0.17%)	⬇️
src/core/yaml-text-check.js	2.22% <6.66%> (-1.86%)	⬇️
src/core/tn-links-check.js	52.34% <46.21%> (-16.73%)	⬇️
src/core/annotation-table-check.js	2.36% <50.00%> (-0.77%)	⬇️
src/core/field-text-check.js	57.69% <51.28%> (+1.87%)	⬆️
src/core/orig-quote-check.js	63.58% <73.52%> (ø)
... and 20 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bbba5f5...b600d85. Read the comment docs.

[RobH123]

@mandolyte @PhotoNomad0 Sorry for such a big PR. Lots of testing on real data and fine-tuning. Some changes to API.

Note especially that notices for known faults can now be disabled. See https://github.com/unfoldingWord/uw-content-validation/blob/RJHimprovements/src/demos/notice-processing-functions.js#L359 for that. Note that notices now require a username field to make this work -- see https://github.com/unfoldingWord/uw-content-validation/blob/RJHimprovements/src/demos/book-package-check/checkBookPackage.js#L231 for how I do that. The concept should still work if different files have different repo usernames. Note also that a repoCode field is also needed in the notices, e.g., UHB,UGNT,LT,ST,TA,TW. For existing tN and tQ, it's TN1 and TQ1. TN, TQ, and TWL are reserved for the new TSV repos. You can see the repoCode being added in this function.

[mandolyte]

Reviewed 35 of 35 files at r1, 27 of 48 files at r2, 25 of 25 files at r3.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @PhotoNomad0)