Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verilog,unit: lint-check unit tests #3787

Merged

Conversation

hirooih
Copy link
Contributor

@hirooih hirooih commented Jul 29, 2023

  • fix issues reported by svlint

  • Intended errors still remain.

- fix issues reported by [svlint](https://github.com/dalance/svlint)

- Intended errors still remain.

Signed-off-by: Hiroo HAYASHI <24754036+hirooih@users.noreply.github.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 29, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.04% 🎉

Comparison is base (6b06565) 82.99% compared to head (6e1f88e) 83.04%.
Report is 147 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3787      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.99%   83.04%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         226      227       +1     
  Lines       54972    55200     +228     
==========================================
+ Hits        45626    45840     +214     
- Misses       9346     9360      +14     

see 46 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hirooih hirooih merged commit 0603680 into universal-ctags:master Jul 29, 2023
38 checks passed
@hirooih hirooih deleted the verilog-unit-test-lint-check branch July 29, 2023 07:04
@masatake
Copy link
Member

If you are interested in keeping the input files for your language valid, you can use a validator. See https://docs.ctags.io/en/latest/testing-parser.html?highlight=validator#validator-file

@hirooih hirooih mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants