Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: Solidity class fields to Rust struct #264

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

0xf333
Copy link
Contributor

@0xf333 0xf333 commented Aug 27, 2023

Fix solidity example and update ink example to conform with v4

Description

  • Added SPDX license identifier for Solidity.
  • Fixed the syntax for the if condition in Solidity.
  • Fixed event emit syntax.
  • Added no_main attribute in ink! contract.

@0xf333 0xf333 force-pushed the 0xf333/Solidity_class_to_Rust_struct branch from 5f2f931 to 4471b72 Compare August 28, 2023 12:43
Fix solidity example and update ink example to
conform with v4

Description
============
- Added SPDX license identifier for Solidity.
- Fixed the syntax for the `if` condition in Solidity.
- Fixed event emit syntax.
- Added `no_main` attribute in ink! contract.
@0xf333 0xf333 force-pushed the 0xf333/Solidity_class_to_Rust_struct branch from 4471b72 to b802fa9 Compare August 28, 2023 12:44
@0xf333 0xf333 requested a review from SkymanOne August 28, 2023 13:02
@0xf333
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xf333 commented Aug 28, 2023

@SkymanOne

This should probably be fixed in a separated pull request since it's not part of this PR scope.

Check Markdown links / markdown-link-check (pull_request) 

Let me know what you think.

@0xf333
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xf333 commented Sep 4, 2023

@SkymanOne

This should probably be fixed in a separated pull request since it's not part of this PR scope.

Check Markdown links / markdown-link-check (pull_request) 

Let me know what you think.

markdown-link-check failure has been fixed in #273 #272 #271

Reason for separated PR is to ensure that each link issue was resolved independently, providing a clearer history.

@0xf333 0xf333 requested a review from ascjones September 8, 2023 13:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants