Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add detection of arm64 architecture for macos builds #258

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

betajippity
Copy link

This commit adds detection of arm64 for macos builds on arm64 hardware.
The only change necessary is an additional case in the code where
macos.inc queries and detects the system architecture.

This commit adds detection of arm64 for macos builds on arm64 hardware.
The only change necessary is an additional case in the code where
macos.inc queries and detects the system architecture.
@claui
Copy link

claui commented Jul 11, 2020

Confirming that the hw.machine branch works just fine. It even returns x86_64 when run under Rosetta.

chrisburr added a commit to regro-cf-autotick-bot/tbb-feedstock that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2020
Axel-Naumann added a commit to Axel-Naumann/root that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2021
Axel-Naumann added a commit to Axel-Naumann/root that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2021
Axel-Naumann added a commit to root-project/root that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2021
* [cmake] Patch tbb for Apple M1 (issue #6903).

Apply patch from uxlfoundation/oneTBB#258
@anton-potapov
Copy link
Contributor

@betajippity oneTBB has moved to CMake. please update the patch (if still applicable)

@anton-potapov
Copy link
Contributor

@betajippity , FIY oneTBB should work on ARM64 (at least on Windows), for more details see #507

@anton-potapov
Copy link
Contributor

It seems that this is already implemented in oneTBB 2021.3 See #344 for more details.

@betajippity please reopen if something is missing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants