fix: vxeGrid default sort data no effect in first query #5141
Conversation
mynetfan
requested review from
anncwb,
vince292007 and
a team
as code owners
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mynetfan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 7 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces sorting capabilities to the VbenVxeGrid component across multiple files. In the backend mock API ( Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Grid
participant API
Client->>Grid: Configure sortable columns
Client->>Grid: Trigger sort
Grid->>API: Send sort parameters
API->>API: Sort data
API-->>Grid: Return sorted data
Grid->>Client: Display sorted data
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/backend-mock/api/table/list.ts (1)
48-69: Consider optimizing the sorting implementation.While the current implementation is functional, consider these improvements:
- Use a type-safe approach for sortBy field validation
- Consider caching sorted results for frequently used sort combinations
- if (sortBy && Reflect.has(listData[0], sortBy as string)) { + const validSortFields = ['category', 'color', 'productName', 'price'] as const; + type ValidSortField = typeof validSortFields[number]; + + if (sortBy && validSortFields.includes(sortBy as ValidSortField)) { listData.sort((a, b) => { - if (sortOrder === 'asc') { - if (sortBy === 'price') { - return ( - Number.parseFloat(a[sortBy as string]) - - Number.parseFloat(b[sortBy as string]) - ); - } else { - return a[sortBy as string] > b[sortBy as string] ? 1 : -1; - } - } else { - if (sortBy === 'price') { - return ( - Number.parseFloat(b[sortBy as string]) - - Number.parseFloat(a[sortBy as string]) - ); - } else { - return a[sortBy as string] < b[sortBy as string] ? 1 : -1; - } - } + const field = sortBy as ValidSortField; + const multiplier = sortOrder === 'asc' ? 1 : -1; + + if (field === 'price') { + return multiplier * (Number.parseFloat(a[field]) - Number.parseFloat(b[field])); + } + + return multiplier * a[field].localeCompare(b[field]); }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/backend-mock/api/table/list.ts(1 hunks)packages/effects/plugins/src/vxe-table/use-vxe-grid.vue(1 hunks)playground/src/views/examples/vxe-table/remote.vue(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
playground/src/views/examples/vxe-table/remote.vue (2)
28-31: LGTM: Column configuration for sorting is properly implemented.
The sortable property is correctly added to the relevant columns, enabling sorting functionality.
39-44: Verify sort parameter handling across the application.
The sort configuration and proxy setup look correct. However, we should verify:
- The backend API correctly processes these sort parameters
- The default sort on 'category' field works as expected
Also applies to: 48-52
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the API implementation to verify the sort parameter handling.
Based on the analysis of the code, I can now provide a final response:
Sort parameter handling is correctly implemented across the application
The verification shows that:
- The backend API (
apps/backend-mock/api/table/list.ts) properly handles bothsortByandsortOrderparameters with correct type checking and sorting logic, including special handling for numeric fields like 'price'. - The sort configuration is consistently implemented in the table components, with multiple sortable columns defined in both remote and basic table examples.
- The default sort on 'category' field is uniquely configured in the remote table component and doesn't conflict with other implementations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify sort parameter handling across components
# Check if other grid instances also implement sorting
rg -A 2 "sortable: true"
# Check if other components use similar sort configuration
rg -A 2 "defaultSort.*category"
# Check if the API endpoint handles these parameters consistently
rg -A 2 "sortBy.*sortOrder"
Length of output: 1800
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the API implementation details
cat apps/backend-mock/api/table/list.ts
# Check if there are any other API endpoints using similar sort parameters
rg -g "*.ts" -A 5 "sortOrder.*desc|asc"
# Check for any test files related to sorting
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts -X cat
Length of output: 65677
apps/backend-mock/api/table/list.ts (1)
46-47: LGTM: Safe data handling with structuredClone.
Good practice using structuredClone to avoid modifying the original data.
Description
修复VxeGrid的defaultSort在第一次请求时不起作用的问题
fix #5125
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
pnpm-lock.yamlunless you introduce a new test example.Checklist
pnpm run docs:devcommand.pnpm test.feat:,fix:,perf:,docs:, orchore:.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
category,color,productName, andprice.categoryfield in descending order.Bug Fixes
Documentation