Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run tests into travis containers #249

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 22, 2017
Merged

Conversation

goetas
Copy link
Collaborator

@goetas goetas commented May 17, 2017

For faster builds

See https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/ci-environment/#Virtualization-environments

Container-based (Fast boot time environment in which sudo commands are not available)

in this project "13 min 59 sec" (current) vs "9 min 55 sec" (proposed)

@willdurand willdurand self-requested a review May 17, 2017 11:26
@willdurand
Copy link
Owner

Would you have a hint regarding HHVM?

@goetas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

goetas commented May 17, 2017

sure, will check it on friday

@goetas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

goetas commented May 19, 2017

@willdurand Regarding HHVM, it looks that HHVM <3.9 had some problems, did not check into deep, but my feeling is that there were some issue with SplObjectStack (used internally in the jms context)

Question: does it make sense to support the not-maintained versions of symfony (2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7)?
The build matrix is really big (too big IMO).

@goetas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

goetas commented May 19, 2017

Ah, to run all this symfony versions, I have reverted for now the "containerized" env

@willdurand willdurand merged commit 6b3285c into willdurand:master May 22, 2017
@willdurand
Copy link
Owner

thanks!

@willdurand
Copy link
Owner

Question: does it make sense to support the not-maintained versions of symfony (2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7)?

nope ...

@goetas goetas deleted the patch-1 branch May 22, 2017 10:18
@goetas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

goetas commented May 22, 2017

Question: does it make sense to support the not-maintained versions of symfony (2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7)?

nope...

If I will have to work on this again, plan to remove them

@goetas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

goetas commented May 22, 2017

any plans to tag a new release?

@willdurand
Copy link
Owner

If I will have to work on this again, plan to remove them

👍

@willdurand
Copy link
Owner

any plans to tag a new release?

today hopefully

@goetas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

goetas commented May 22, 2017

great :)

@willdurand
Copy link
Owner

here it is! 2.11.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants