Add breaking note for command: removal
#2056
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
6543
added
documentation
6543
added
bug
This was referenced Jul 28, 2023
|
I'll backport it with #2058 once both are merged :) |
xoxys
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2023
anbraten
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2023
6543
added a commit
to 6543-forks/woodpecker
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2023
close woodpecker-ci#2054 as we missed at woodpecker-ci#1032 that it was mentioned at one point in the docs and so it was a breaking change
6543
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2023
mzampetakis
pushed a commit
to mzampetakis/woodpecker
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2023
close woodpecker-ci#2054 as we missed at woodpecker-ci#1032 that it was mentioned at one point in the docs and so it was a breaking change
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
close #2054
as we missed at #1032 that it was mentioned at one point in the docs and so it was a breaking change