We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If a bitfield field was lifted into its unit we do not find it when operating from a different unit.
module foo; type X = unit { : bitfield(8) { a: 0..7; }; }; type Y = unit(x: X) { on %init { print x.a; } };
$ spicyc -dj foo.spicy [error] foo.spicy:10:22: type does not have field 'a' [error] spicyc: aborting after errors
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@rsmmr I added this to the bitfield tracking ticket so we can make sure to get to it before zeek-6.1.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Fix access to anonymous bitfield element through a constant value.
904444c
Closes #1533.
5ca1c94
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/topic/robin/gh-1533-bitfield-fix'
18836f5
* origin/topic/robin/gh-1533-bitfield-fix: Fix access to anonymous bitfield element through a constant value.
rsmmr
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
If a bitfield field was lifted into its unit we do not find it when operating from a different unit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: