Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: verify order edges #1293

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024
Merged

test: verify order edges #1293

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

doug-q
Copy link
Collaborator

@doug-q doug-q commented Jul 11, 2024

fixes #1167 fixes #1284

@doug-q doug-q requested a review from ss2165 July 11, 2024 08:38
@doug-q doug-q requested a review from a team as a code owner July 11, 2024 08:38
@doug-q
Copy link
Collaborator Author

doug-q commented Jul 11, 2024

It turns out there is no problem here, as shown by the test. Apologies for the distraction. It maybe that this test is not even worth having in tree.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.22%. Comparing base (a70ca87) to head (1f96382).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1293      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.19%   87.22%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         107      107              
  Lines       19513    19553      +40     
  Branches    17251    17291      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits        17015    17056      +41     
  Misses       1719     1719              
+ Partials      779      778       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
rust 86.68% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ss2165
Copy link
Member

ss2165 commented Jul 12, 2024

I don't mind about keeping or removing the test, but I would suggest removing the "fixes" from the commit description. Those issues should be closed as not happening, rather than fixed. I will do that now.

@doug-q doug-q added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 16, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit a6a9b74 Jul 16, 2024
20 checks passed
@doug-q doug-q deleted the doug/order-edges-are-fine branch July 16, 2024 12:37
@hugrbot hugrbot mentioned this pull request Jul 16, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2024
## 🤖 New release
* `hugr`: 0.8.0 -> 0.9.0
* `hugr-core`: 0.5.0 -> 0.6.0
* `hugr-passes`: 0.5.0 -> 0.6.0
* `hugr-cli`: 0.1.4 -> 0.2.0

<details><summary><i><b>Changelog</b></i></summary><p>

## `hugr`
<blockquote>

## 0.9.0 (2024-07-19)

### Bug Fixes

- Add op's extension to signature check in `resolve_opaque_op`
([#1317](#1317))
- Panic on `SimpleReplace` with multiports
([#1324](#1324))

### Refactor

- [**breaking**] Separate Signature from FuncValueType by parametrizing
Type(/Row)/etc. ([#1138](#1138))

### Testing

- Verify order edges ([#1293](#1293))
- Add failing test case for
[#1315](#1315)
([#1316](#1316))
</blockquote>

## `hugr-core`
<blockquote>

## 0.6.0 (2024-07-19)

### Bug Fixes

- Add op's extension to signature check in `resolve_opaque_op`
([#1317](#1317))
- Panic on `SimpleReplace` with multiports
([#1324](#1324))

### Refactor

- [**breaking**] Separate Signature from FuncValueType by parametrizing
Type(/Row)/etc. ([#1138](#1138))

### Testing

- Verify order edges ([#1293](#1293))
- Add failing test case for
[#1315](#1315)
([#1316](#1316))
</blockquote>

## `hugr-passes`
<blockquote>

## 0.6.0 (2024-07-19)

### Refactor

- [**breaking**] Separate Signature from FuncValueType by parametrizing
Type(/Row)/etc. ([#1138](#1138))
</blockquote>

## `hugr-cli`
<blockquote>

## 0.2.0 (2024-07-19)

### Refactor

- [**breaking**] Separate Signature from FuncValueType by parametrizing
Type(/Row)/etc. ([#1138](#1138))
</blockquote>


</p></details>

---
This PR was generated with
[release-plz](https://github.com/MarcoIeni/release-plz/).

---------

Co-authored-by: Douglas Wilson <douglas.wilson@quantinuum.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Call cannot have order edges LoadConstant nodes can't have OrderEdges
2 participants