-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Tracking] Fix Composer Component Focus Issues #15992
Comments
Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this? |
6 days overdue. This is scarier than being forced to listen to Vogon poetry! |
Now this issue is 8 days overdue. Are you sure this should be a Daily? Feel free to change it! |
12 days overdue. Walking. Toward. The. Light... |
This issue has not been updated in over 14 days. eroding to Weekly issue. |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
My bad, I mentioned this issue in the wrong place. |
This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. eroding to Monthly issue. P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do! |
this might need to be tracked here #18007 |
feel free to edit and add them as you see fit, I don't need to be pinged or approve adding issues to this. |
Added #22664 to the list of related issues. |
Adding #30689 |
@bondydaa, this Monthly task hasn't been acted upon in 6 weeks; closing. If you disagree, feel encouraged to reopen it -- but pick your least important issue to close instead. |
@bondydaa should this one remained open? |
I'm not sure it needs to. it's super old and I believe Monil had already
implemented a doc to fix most of this so probably anything that might still
be a problem can be spun up as a new issue and follow the current BZ flow.
…On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 12:58 PM April Bekkala ***@***.***> wrote:
@bondydaa <https://github.com/bondydaa> should this one remained open?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#15992 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA7CPCWZR3W2EZ2AF3VVZI3YSE2VHAVCNFSM6AAAAAAV37WQNOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMRXHE4TMNJYHA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Proposal
There have been a few threads where these discussions happened (Expenisfy internal slack discussion) https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C03U7DCU4/p1673042523102459?thread_ts=1672788778.947399&cid=C03U7DCU4
and here in the external slack https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1671056016060879
I believe the final place we landed was
Ultimately what we want to do is stop trying to continually patch the existing code as we've sort of gotten into a bad spot with it. The goal of this is to start with a blank canvas and come up with a plan on how we want the composer component and the focus/blur interactions to work as if it didn't exist yet.
Once we have the overall design we desire we can then see how the current code fits with it, if it needs to be rewritten then we'll do that, if we can just tweak the existing code and get it to work then we can do that.
Tasks
#expensify-open-source
strategy@expensify.com
and paste in the Proposalstrategy@expensify.com
(continue the same email chain as before) with the link to your Design Doc#expensify-open-source
to discuss any necessary details in public before filling out the High-level of proposed solution section.stategy@expensify.com
again with links to the doc and pre-design conversation in SlackDesignDocReview
label to get the High-level of proposed solution section reviewed#expensify-open-source
to ask for engineering feedback on the technical solution.DesignDocReview
label to this issuestrategy@expensify.com
one last time to let them know the Design Doc is moving into the implementation phasestrategy@expensify.com
once everything has been implemented and do a Project Wrap-Up retrospective that provides:Related Issues (Please add any new issues as they are reported) N.B. - closing some until this is picked up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: