Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bank error message #11839

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2022
Merged

Fix bank error message #11839

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2022

Conversation

Puneet-here
Copy link
Contributor

@Puneet-here Puneet-here commented Oct 14, 2022

Details

The error message for Add personal bank account page wasn't correct. We are just fixing that.

Fixed Issues

$ #11652
PROPOSAL: #11652 (comment)

Tests

  1. Update .env file to
NEW_EXPENSIFY_URL=https://staging.new.expensify.com/
EXPENSIFY_URL=https://staging.expensify.com/
  1. Changed
    key: ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_BANK_ACCOUNT,
    value: {
    isLoading: false,
    errors: null,
    shouldShowSuccess: true,

    to
                 key: ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_BANK_ACCOUNT,
                 value: {
                     isLoading: false,
-                    errors: null,
-                    shouldShowSuccess: true,
+                    errors: {
+                        [DateUtils.getMicroseconds()]: Localize.translateLocal('paymentsPage.addBankAccountFailure'),
+                    },
                 },
  1. Change shouldShowSuccess to false
    {shouldShowSuccess ? (
  2. Go to payments > add payment method
  3. Bank account > Select fidelty at onfido and use user_good, pass_good
  4. Select account > add password > press save & continue
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Review Checklist

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

PR Reviewer Checklist

The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

QA Steps

  1. Go to settings > Payments > Add payment method
  2. Bank account > Plaid flow
  3. While in Plaid Sandbox mode, enter any data
  4. You'll be brought back to Expensify
  5. Select a bank account in the dropdown
  6. Use a wrong password > Click Save & continue
  7. Verify the error says "An unexpected error occurred while trying to add your bank account. Please try again."
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Screenshots

Web

Screenshot 2022-10-18 at 10 58 12 PM

Screenshot 2022-10-18 at 10 56 40 PM

Mobile Web - Chrome

Screenshot 2022-10-18 at 11 06 49 PM

Screenshot 2022-10-18 at 11 06 20 PM

Mobile Web - Safari

Screenshot 2022-10-18 at 11 17 26 PM

Screenshot 2022-10-18 at 11 17 11 PM

Desktop

Screenshot 2022-10-18 at 11 10 43 PM

Screenshot 2022-10-18 at 11 10 26 PM

iOS

Screenshot 2022-10-18 at 11 15 19 PM

Screenshot 2022-10-18 at 11 14 59 PM

Android

Screenshot 2022-10-18 at 11 00 37 PM

@Puneet-here Puneet-here marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2022 14:32
@Puneet-here Puneet-here requested a review from a team as a code owner October 14, 2022 14:32
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ctkochan22 and eVoloshchak and removed request for a team October 14, 2022 14:32
@Puneet-here
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ctkochan22 @eVoloshchak, the plaid flow can't be tested locally. Any idea how can I attach the screenshots for this PR?

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

@ctkochan22 @eVoloshchak, the plaid flow can't be tested locally. Any idea how can I attach the screenshots for this PR?

I think there is a dummy account, but I haven't tested it
Following the description of #8640

  • Log into a valid applause.expensifail.com account and Enable the Staging server
  • Tap on "Wells Fargo" bank and enter correct credentials (user_good and pass_good)

But for me there is no option to enable the staging server in settings

@ctkochan22
Copy link
Contributor

You can test plaid locally:

  • Update getPlaidLinkTokenParameters/index.js's redirect_uri to: return {redirect_uri: https://localhost:8080/${bankAccountRoute}`};`
  • From there you should be able to render our plaid sandbox. From there, you can use user_good and pass_good to get a 200 response

@Puneet-here
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am seeing the plaid modal but when I choose a bank it redirect me to the bank login page

Screen.Recording.2022-10-17.at.2.18.03.PM.mov

@ctkochan22
Copy link
Contributor

hmmm what does your .env file look like? When testing on dev you should be hitting Plaid's sandbox

@Puneet-here
Copy link
Contributor Author

Puneet-here commented Oct 17, 2022

hmmm what does your .env file look like? When testing on dev you should be hitting Plaid's sandbox

I didn't make any changes in .env file so it's not related to it. Let's ask at slack maybe someone will be able to help.

I have asked about it here.

@ctkochan22
Copy link
Contributor

Update your .env file to

NEW_EXPENSIFY_URL=https://staging.new.expensify.com/
EXPENSIFY_URL=https://staging.expensify.com/
  1. Re-build npm run web/ios

@Puneet-here
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @ctkochan22, thanks for all the help. I have attached the screenshots but I am not sure about the QA steps. The steps that were listed in the OP aren't useful now. We were getting this error earlier even on adding wrong password but some PR has added some validation for this so the error will only show up on failure. I am not sure how we can repro the failure.

For locally testing I have added these steps -

  1. Update .env file to
NEW_EXPENSIFY_URL=https://staging.new.expensify.com/
EXPENSIFY_URL=https://staging.expensify.com/
  1. Changed
    key: ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_BANK_ACCOUNT,
    value: {
    isLoading: false,
    errors: null,
    shouldShowSuccess: true,

    to
                 key: ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_BANK_ACCOUNT,
                 value: {
                     isLoading: false,
-                    errors: null,
-                    shouldShowSuccess: true,
+                    errors: {
+                        [DateUtils.getMicroseconds()]: Localize.translateLocal('paymentsPage.addBankAccountFailure'),
+                    },
                 },
  1. Change shouldShowSuccess to false
    {shouldShowSuccess ? (
  2. Go to payments > add payment method
  3. Bank account > Select fidelty at onfido and use user_good, pass_good
  4. Select account > add password > press save & continue

Copy link
Contributor

@eVoloshchak eVoloshchak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was unable to add the account locally, so tested this by changing the source code. Looks good

PR Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

@ctkochan22 ctkochan22 merged commit 07fc7d7 into Expensify:main Oct 20, 2022
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Oct 20, 2022
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 20, 2022

@ctkochan22 looks like this was merged without the checklist test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@ctkochan22
Copy link
Contributor

Everything was checked off

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by @ctkochan22 in version: 1.2.19-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by @chiragsalian in version: 1.2.19-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants